http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
Summary: constexpr member function cannot use the class type it
belongs as parameter type or return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 21:07:42 UTC ---
The following variant is correctly being rejected:
implicit none
type :: rectangle
real :: width, height
procedure(get_area), pointer, pass(this) :: get_special
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48237
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48237
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 18:41:05 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Mar 26 18:41:02 2011
New Revision: 171560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171560
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2011-03-24
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 18:39:19 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Mar 26 18:39:14 2011
New Revision: 171559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171559
Log:
2011-03-26 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from John Dav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-03-26
17:49:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> not sure if this will help.
> but i found this problem with -O2 optimzed code in GCC 4.5.1 (and 4.4.1)
AJ, if you are unsure that it is the same bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26 17:34:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Your patch is approved after regression testing and thanks for getting on it
> so
> quickly.
Thanks. Regtest was successful. Will commit shortly.
ck 19
101 007a 3EBD pop{r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, pc}
102 .sizepnm_gethdr, .-pnm_gethdr
103 .ident"GCC: (GNU) 4.7.0 20110326 (experimental)
[trunk revision 171556]"
ARM GAS /tmp/ccLnp6gX.s page
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444
--- Comment #12 from AJ 2011-03-26 16:56:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43270
--- Comment #20 from AJ 2011-03-26 16:56:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46759
--- Comment #6 from AJ 2011-03-26 16:56:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
ignore my comments. i can't confirm it sufficiently. i might be wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295
--- Comment #1 from Frederic Riss 2011-03-26
16:15:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23779
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23779
Failing code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295
Summary: Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point
rounding mode switches
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47855
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43270
AJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #19 from AJ 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46759
AJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from AJ 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47444
AJ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aj664 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from AJ 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-26
15:23:05 UTC ---
Your patch is approved after regression testing and thanks for getting on it so
quickly. Maybe the release managers might want to sneak it in to 4.6.0 but
perhaps its too late. Certai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Vincent Riviere changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent.riviere at freesbee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] internal compiler |[4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48291
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-03-26
11:40:54 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Sat Mar 26 11:40:51 2011
New Revision: 171555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171555
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48144
* sel-sched-i
/except.c:1217
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[kkloepper@pan scratch]$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20110326 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294
Summary: internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at
cp/except.c:1217
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:24:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:24:06 2011
New Revision: 171549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171549
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-24 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:23:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:23:01 2011
New Revision: 171548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171548
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-20 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42544
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:23:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:23:01 2011
New Revision: 171548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171548
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-20 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:21:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:21:34 2011
New Revision: 171547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171547
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-20 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:20:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:20:34 2011
New Revision: 171546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171546
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-17 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-26
09:19:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Mar 26 09:19:36 2011
New Revision: 171545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171545
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-03-17 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-03-26 08:29:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 23778
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23778
Output of gcc -v -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-03-26 08:28:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23777
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23777
Output of gcc -v -O2 -flto
> Maybe show -v output of a failing compile?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-03-26 08:25:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23776
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23776
Backtrace #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-03-26 08:24:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23775
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23775
Backtrace #1
Reproduced with i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.6.1 (GCC) 4.6.1 20110325 (prerelease)
> Can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48275
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
--- Comment #25 from Ryan Hill 2011-03-26
08:04:14 UTC ---
-fno-inline-small-functions works with -O2, not -Os.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48293
--- Comment #1 from yuta tomino
2011-03-26 07:31:35 UTC ---
I'm sorry about wrong attachments.
I deleted "limited" of P1.T by mistake, please add "limited" or look the code
in the report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #24 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48293
Summary: Legal program rejected, empty discriminant blocks
object allocation with built-in-place
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
42 matches
Mail list logo
