http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29615
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51659
--- Comment #2 from Carrot 2012-01-05 07:06:22 UTC
---
It can be reproduced with following simple code
struct function
{
int pops_args;
long long x_frame_offset;
};
long long get_func_frame_size (struct function *f)
{
return -f->x_frame
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Summary|[4.7 Regression] IC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29615
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-05
05:43:22 UTC ---
The submitter said that he expected a warning, and it seems correct to me. It
would probably be good to have a general mechanism for disabling individual
warnings by code number, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51742
--- Comment #3 from Steven Schweda 2012-01-05
05:23:43 UTC ---
> This is the first time the stage1 compiler is used which means it doesn't work
> at all. [...]
Not as I understand "the first time". The end of the log looks like this:
[...]
/us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-05
02:25:10 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 5 02:25:04 2012
New Revision: 182900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182900
Log:
PR bootstrap/51072
* configure.ac: Fix r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #16 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-05
01:35:29 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 5 01:35:25 2012
New Revision: 182899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182899
Log:
PR bootstrap/51072
* configure.ac: Disab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-05
01:34:21 UTC ---
Curious. It still fails even if there is a declaration of func at namespace
scope.
It works with -fkeep-inline-functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38659
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37949
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37465
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-01-05
00:58:13 UTC ---
I've now realized the reason we fail to find the (plus:si (reg:si r1)
(const_int -1)) is that reverse_op miscomputes the hash of value 22, because
we're looking up an expr containing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-05
00:56:59 UTC ---
Related bugs (null as actual argument):
PR12841 (fixed long ago), PR44666 (fixed on 4.6)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758
Bug #: 51758
Summary: ICE with optional arguments of elemental procedures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-05
00:35:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> OTOH, loop optimizer should detect invariant loads and move them out of the
> loop.
Just for someone else looking into this bug and thinking the last part o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31843
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51743
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-05
00:31:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> These tests just shuffle bytes around, so I was under impression that the
> functionality is isolated from OS. And Hello world executes correctly when
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31843
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24296
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Summary|[4.7 Regression] Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-05
00:29:16 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 5 00:29:13 2012
New Revision: 182897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182897
Log:
PR debug/51746
* var-tracking.c (add_stores
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29615
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24296
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-01-05
00:17:27 UTC ---
Thanks, Jakub, the patch is fine, I've just verified that it fixes the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51751
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2012-01-04
23:18:15 UTC ---
Also fails with 4.5.3 on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu at -O3, and with current
trunk at -O0.
Does not fail on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with current trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Peslyak
2012-01-04 23:00:24 UTC ---
(I ran the tests below and wrote this comment before seeing Jakub's. Then I
thought I'd post it anyway.)
Here are some numbers for gcc releases:
4.0.0 - 383K c/s, 71879 bytes (t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757
Bug #: 51757
Summary: friend defined inside class and declared inside main
linker error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-04
22:24:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I still wonder though why Richard Henderson says in PR50283 comment 9: We're
> supposed to prevent frame-related insns from appearing in branch delay slots
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51640
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||35112
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51756
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.3
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 21:43:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > AFAIU, the only thing causing problems is frame-related insns being
> > speculated.
>
> Yes this patch seems more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-04
21:40:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26243
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26243
gcc47-pr51648.patch
Untested patch that implements this in tree-cfg.c (as I wrote, another
alternat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-04
21:37:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 4 21:37:11 2012
New Revision: 182890
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182890
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51624
* tree-sra.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-04
21:34:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 4 21:34:27 2012
New Revision: 182889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182889
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51624
* tree-sra.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51756
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51756
Bug #: 51756
Summary: wrong warning: uninitialized variable put into program
memory area
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-04
21:26:11 UTC ---
I think the problem is that we have a noreturn call (in the short testcase
fatal_error), which doesn't have EDGE_FAKE to exit added by
add_noreturn_fake_exit_edges because it has succ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51640
--- Comment #2 from petschy at gmail dot com 2012-01-04 20:45:00 UTC ---
I pinpointed the commit that introduced the bug, using git bisect:
commit 4272a2e82e431ac85afd0404d49b28043dc480ee
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 27 10:44:49 2009 +
git-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.8.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-04
20:00:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> AFAIU, the only thing causing problems is frame-related insns being
> speculated.
Yes this patch seems more correct. I will submit it after a bootstrap/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-04
19:58:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 19:58:03 2012
New Revision: 182886
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182886
Log:
PR debug/51695
* dwarf2out.c (output_loc_li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26239|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Peslyak
2012-01-04 19:39:26 UTC ---
I wrote and ran some scripts to test many versions/snapshots of gcc. It turns
out that 4.6-20100703 (oldest 4.6 snapshot available for FTP) was already
affected by this regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||51754
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-04
19:02:33 UTC ---
also PR 51294
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755
Bug #: 51755
Summary: -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary
operator is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49693
--- Comment #7 from Harald Klimach 2012-01-04
18:41:08 UTC ---
Thanks a lot!
Just ran the gcc trunk over my code, and the annoying warnings are gone.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-suse-linux|powerpc64-suse-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
Bug #: 51754
Summary: [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
Bug #: 51753
Summary: Many gcc.dg/simultate-thread tests fail on Solaris
10+/x86
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
--- Comment #18 from davidxl 2012-01-04 17:11:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
> >
> > --- Comment #16 from davidxl 2012-01-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51164
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51163
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51164
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-04
17:02:05 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Jan 4 17:01:50 2012
New Revision: 182882
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182882
Log:
Add PR reference.
+PR other/51163
+PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51163
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-04
17:02:03 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Jan 4 17:01:50 2012
New Revision: 182882
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182882
Log:
Add PR reference.
+PR other/51163
+PR oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26163|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-04
16:39:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26240
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26240
pr51648-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51064
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51064
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-04 16:40:01 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 4 16:39:53 2012
New Revision: 182880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182880
Log:
/cp
2012-01-04 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-04
16:38:37 UTC ---
That delta script had a typo (was using gcc.o instead of gccmy.o), thus the
resulting preprocessed file is irrelevant.
Here is an actually reduced testcase:
rm -f pr51648-1.gcda pr5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-04
15:06:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Fixed on trunk (4.7), backport bending.
s/bending/pending/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-04
14:57:34 UTC ---
Estimate_edge_devirt_benefit seems to not make much of sense in mixing the
effects of inlining into the local size. Unforutnately we don't really have
much infrastructure for similar cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-04
14:53:44 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:53:30 2012
New Revision: 182877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182877
Log:
PR middle-end/51212
* opts.c (fini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50998
Michal Malecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ethouris at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-04
14:36:38 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Revision: 182875
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Jan 4 14:36:34 2012
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51696
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51696
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-04
14:32:59 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:32:54 2012
New Revision: 182876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182876
Log:
PR middle-end/51696
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-04
14:20:24 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:20:17 2012
New Revision: 182875
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182875
Log:
PR fortran/50981
* trans-array.h (gfc_walk_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 14:20:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> they could have unwanted
> side-effects (reading uninitialized memory, division by zero, producing NaNs
> etc.) that the debugger might complain about loudl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-04
14:18:26 UTC ---
OK, it is bug in estimate_edge_devirt_benefit that cause overall function size
to go bellow 0. I am looking into the fix.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
Bug #: 51752
Summary: trans-mem: publication safety violated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-04
14:04:29 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:04:24 2012
New Revision: 182874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182874
Log:
PR fortran/50981
* trans.h (struct gfc_ss_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51694
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51633
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51614
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51613
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51565
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-04
13:40:19 UTC ---
Oh, and why is this a regression?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-04 13:33:20 UTC ---
> --- Comment #28 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-04
> 13:30:21 UTC ---
> Was the patch installed?
Unfortunately not, I'm currently applying it to my private tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #28 from Richard G
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo