http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-06-05
04:47:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This patch adds the FMA patterns and aligns the SH target with the
> -mfused-madd
> / -mno-fused-madd option handling in other targets.
Make -mfused-madd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580
Bug #: 53580
Summary: Internal Segmentation fault in nested "omp parallel",
"omp parallel for" and "omp parallel for reduction"
Directives
Classification: Unclassified
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27547|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-05
00:24:31 UTC ---
That stuff was a hack to get it working in a hurry, ideally we want a
__gthread_mutex_destroy function. Otherwise, I can fix the sfinae check to work
properly. Presumably just compar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53579
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53579
Bug #: 53579
Summary: libstdc++ configure atomicity tests use CXXFLAGS
instead of CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-05
00:00:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > I assume g++ will hit this too once it adds support for the narrowing check
> > in
> > converted constant expressions.
>
> IIRC g++ had the check for nar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-04
23:55:04 UTC ---
> I assume g++ will hit this too once it adds support for the narrowing check in
> converted constant expressions.
IIRC g++ had the check for narrowing in converted constant expressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Bug #: 53578
Summary: include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed
narrowing conversions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04
23:31:57 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jun 4 23:31:54 2012
New Revision: 188212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188212
Log:
Skip debug insns in ix86_sched_reorder
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ettl.martin at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577
Bug #: 53577
Summary: segmentation fault on syntax error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-04
21:01:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jun 4 21:01:02 2012
New Revision: 188208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188208
Log:
2012-06-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524
--- Comment #21 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-04 20:31:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jun 4 20:30:59 2012
New Revision: 188207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188207
Log:
2012-06-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
--- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-06-04 19:57:31 UTC ---
Hans-Peter and Greta,
Could you please test trunk and, if the commit above fixes the issue for
you, close the bug please?
Thank you in advance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-06-04 19:54:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Could this be a similar problem as observed in bug 53498, comment 1?
Indeed, the testcases look similar and the stack traces are both infinite
recursions that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-06-04 19:52:51 UTC
---
> > !node->symbol.used_from_other_partition
> > - && (DECL_COMDAT (node->symbol.decl)
> > + && ((DECL_COMDAT (node->symbol.decl)
> > + && symtab_used_from_ob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-04
19:35:40 UTC ---
The testcases in comments 2 and 4 are PR 53137, which is fixed for 4.7.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524
--- Comment #20 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-04 19:27:26 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:27:12 2012
New Revision: 188204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188204
Log:
2012-06-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-06-04
19:20:16 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:19:58 2012
New Revision: 188203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188203
Log:
PR preprocessor/53463 - Fix system header detectio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-06-04
19:15:25 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:15:21 2012
New Revision: 188202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188202
Log:
PR 53456 Fix incorrect ChangeLog entry.
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-06-04
19:13:54 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Jun 4 19:13:49 2012
New Revision: 188201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188201
Log:
PR 53456 Fix typo in gf_cputime.
2012-06-04 Rober
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
--- Comment #4 from edmarwjr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04 18:44:58 UTC ---
Author: edmarwjr
Date: Mon Jun 4 18:44:53 2012
New Revision: 188200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188200
Log:
2012-06-04 Edmar Wienskoski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
--- Comment #3 from Kacper Kowalik 2012-06-04
18:23:12 UTC ---
Git bisect show this revision as a culprit:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=163142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
--- Comment #3 from edmarwjr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04 18:15:56 UTC ---
Author: edmarwjr
Date: Mon Jun 4 18:15:46 2012
New Revision: 188198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188198
Log:
2012-06-04 Edmar Wienskoski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53575
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #3 from jwatte at gmail dot com 2012-06-04 18:07:04 UTC ---
I will try -flto and report back. Thanks!
Btw: I think "that's expected" is in the eye of the beholder. If all you've
ever done is VAX/GCC-style UNIX, then it's expected. If y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53576
Bug #: 53576
Summary: Very unhelpful error message: "Unclassifiable
statement" instead of "Can't convert TYPE to ..."
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
--- Comment #2 from edmarwjr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04 17:42:30 UTC ---
Author: edmarwjr
Date: Mon Jun 4 17:42:25 2012
New Revision: 188194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188194
Log:
2012-06-04 Edmar Wienskoski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #5 from Keean Schupke 2012-06-04 17:13:18 UTC ---
The following program will apparently compile correctly, but will silently
produce incorrect results at runtime:
#include
char g(char x) {
return x - 1;
}
template T f(T t) {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:52:55 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:52:47 2012
New Revision: 188191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188191
Log:
PR middle-end/47530
* trans-mem.c (expand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:51:33 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:51:24 2012
New Revision: 188190
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188190
Log:
PR middle-end/47530
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #4 from Keean Schupke 2012-06-04 16:38:21 UTC ---
From C++ Standard N3242=11-0012 14.6 Name Resolution
10. If a name does not depend on a template-parameter (as defined in 14.6.2), a
declaration (or set of declarations) for that name s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:08:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 27303 [details]
> RBTree microbenchmark test case
>
> I believe that I'm seeing this in the RSTM suite's RBTree microbenchmark as
> well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Marlier
2012-06-04 15:58:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 27557
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27557
testcase
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 27556 [details]
> propsed patch being tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
15:51:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27556
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27556
propsed patch being tested
Whoops, sorry Patrick. I already have a patch I am testing :). If you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Marlier
2012-06-04 15:26:37 UTC ---
Aldy,
I have a testcase and a patch for this. I will submit it soon.
Patrick
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rth at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
14:38:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I do not have linker plugin enabled setup handy at the moment, but the
> following patch should fix it:
> Index: cgraph.h
> ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53575
Bug #: 53575
Summary: --with-abi=x32 without --with-multilib-list doesn't
work
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-06-04
14:19:02 UTC ---
I do not have linker plugin enabled setup handy at the moment, but the
following patch should fix it:
Index: cgraph.h
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-06-04
14:03:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> I think as part of the implementation, one should pass to gfc_warning the flag
> which triggers it (or 0 for default warning), similar to "warning_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #3 from Keean Schupke 2012-06-04 13:44:14 UTC ---
From: Technicalities C.13.8.3:
" struct X { X(int); /* ... */ };
"
" void g(X);
"
" template void f(T a) { g(a); }
"
" void h()
" {
" extern void g(int);
" f(2);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-04
13:34:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 27554
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27554
rh828003.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
--- Comment #2 from Keean Schupke 2012-06-04 13:33:38 UTC ---
The function called in the template definition is clearly dependent on the
template parameter 'T' and therefore itsname should be resolved at the point of
instantiation where 'g' is cle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574
Bug #: 53574
Summary: ICE with -fstack-usage
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Keean Schupke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@fry-it.com
--- Comment #1 from Keea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
13:24:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:24:24 2012
New Revision: 188182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188182
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
13:19:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:19:17 2012
New Revision: 188181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188181
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53461
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53461
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-06-04
13:13:15 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Mon Jun 4 13:13:09 2012
New Revision: 188179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188179
Log:
PR target/53461
* config/m68k/m68k.md ("tablejump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573
Bug #: 53573
Summary: template type dependant name resolution broken
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Bug #: 53572
Summary: Some public symbols don't get to serialized LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-04
12:32:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I can confirm this behaviour in gcc-4.6.2, 4.7.0, and 4.8.0 (20120530)
> development version. Since this renders -finit-real=NAN unusable for me, I
> would c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
10:19:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 10:19:44 2012
New Revision: 188176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188176
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1, 4.8.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
--- Comment #2 from Kacper Kowalik 2012-06-04
10:11:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please specify the cloog/ppl versions you are using. What target is this on?
dev-libs/cloog-ppl-0.15.10
dev-libs/ppl-0.11.2-r1
Using built-in specs.
COLL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53563
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04
09:55:44 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:55:35 2012
New Revision: 188175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188175
Log:
Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #24 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04
09:53:14 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:53:04 2012
New Revision: 188174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188174
Log:
Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #23 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04
09:51:05 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:51:00 2012
New Revision: 188173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188173
Log:
Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04
09:48:37 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:48:34 2012
New Revision: 188172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188172
Log:
PR target/46261
* config/avr/avr-stdint.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619
Stephan Weller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc.10.dimsea at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-04
09:27:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:27:00 2012
New Revision: 188170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188170
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53550
* tree-ssa-loop-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-04
09:23:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 4 09:23:27 2012
New Revision: 188169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188169
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53550
* tree-ssa-loop-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
08:43:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
Eric Botca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
--- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
08:43:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
Eric Botca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-04
08:43:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
Eric Botca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-04
08:36:53 UTC ---
This is expected as there is only one section in the object file.
If you use -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections and link with -Wl,--gc-sections.
The unused functions/data will be rem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
gcc-bugx at mailinator dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugx at mailinator dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
Bug #: 53571
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE with -O{2,3}
-floop-parallelize-all in cloog_domain_stride()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #1 from jwatte at gmail dot com 2012-06-04 07:08:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 27551
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27551
Reproduction case (gzipped tar archive)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Bug #: 53570
Summary: Unused symbols are not removed for fully static
targets (avr-gcc)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
90 matches
Mail list logo
