https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> However I have restore my testing of the gfortran test suite with -g -flto
> and I see the following new failures:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_14.f90 -g -flto (internal compiler error)
> FAIL:
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:27584
0xf19ac5 cp_parser_class_specifier_1
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:22731
xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experimental)
This looks potentially similar to bug #84160, but I'm running a more recent
version where that bug s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC bisection reveals that this started misbehaving with r249105 when
-freorder-blocks-and-partition has been turned on by default, and with explicit
-freorder-blocks-and-partition it started failing with r24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #4 from Pedro Alves ---
infrun: stepped into subroutine
#1 infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x5b88b8
#2 infrun: resume (step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=0, current
thread [process 25164] at 0x8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617
Bug ID: 84617
Summary: new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and
g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Dolan ---
Thanks for the quick fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #26 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note the testcase:
void timer_stop();
volatile long keepgoing = 0;
double hand_benchmark_cache_ronly( double *x, long limit, long *oloops, double
*ous) {
long index = 0, loops = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84534
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Wed Feb 28 15:43:41 2018
New Revision: 258071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83399
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr83399.c: Only ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 28 15:33:33 2018
New Revision: 258070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 28 15:27:17 2018
New Revision: 258069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/84517 allow double-underscore macros after string literal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Could we just move
init = cp_fully_fold (init);
a few lines above, before the checks?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:01:38PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > This is expected.
>
> Inde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616
Bug ID: 84616
Summary: funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results
for 4x4 matrix inversion
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32770
--- Comment #2 from Dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615
Bug ID: 84615
Summary: [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled
with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
So it's equivalent to:
$ cat ~/Programming/testcases/pr84592-3.c
#include
int
main (void)
{
int n[1];
n[0] = 4;
#pragma omp target
{
static const int test[] = {1,2,3,4};
n[1] += test[n[0]];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use bug 26163. This is a dup of that one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Feb 28 13:45:59 2018
New Revision: 258063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258063&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix timevar format and fix tests (PR testsuite/84597).
2018-02-28 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 28 13:40:41 2018
New Revision: 258061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-28 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/84607
* gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Anthony Williams from comment #16)
> Would it be worth ignoring pthread_once and using an implementation of
> call_once based on Mike Burrows' algorithm?
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614
Bug ID: 84614
Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code with u16->u128 extension at
aarch64 -fno-split-wide-types -g3
--param=max-combine-insns=3
Product: gcc
Version: 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81670
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Feb 28 12:32:10 2018
New Revision: 258060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/84602] ICE with anon-struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
There are also a few tests that are scanning tree-dump for not "abort".
I have spotted:
gfortran.dg/bound_simplification_3.f90
gfortran.dg/bound_simplification_4.f90
gfortran.dg/bound_simplification
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is expected.
Indeed! I have found it in module.c.
> This PR should be closed as INVALID.
(1) AFAICT this not documented. Is NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE the only parameter in
ISO_FORTRAN_ENV triggeri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ---
For the c++ sample:
typedef struct agg { long a; long b; long c; } agg;
class abc {
long m;
public:
agg foo(long a, long b, long c);
agg boo(void);
};
agg abc::foo(long a, long b, long c)
{
agg r =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Gutson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> I frequently use raise(SIGSTOP) ... (or x86 specific you can do asm ("int
> 3");
> or whatever that break thing was...
>
> Note I think that a compiler-only-sid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> It's not just -faggressive-loop-optimizations, it seems that constructors of
> weak globals are available for folding, and I really doubt that's actually
> i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84612
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Should not it be
> >
> > abcde
> > a
>
> No. ...
OK! Sorry for my limited understanding of TRANSFER.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #25 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #23)
> (In reply to amker from comment #22)
>
> > > So my suggestion would be to see if you can make SLSR generate
> > > TARGET_MEM_REFs
> > > based on som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
>
> --- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #23 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to amker from comment #22)
> > So my suggestion would be to see if you can make SLSR generate
> > TARGET_MEM_REFs
> > based on some common infrastructure with IVOPTs.
> Yes, I also believe streng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613
Bug ID: 84613
Summary: [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
--- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21)
> One major flaw here is that IVOPTs does nothing on this loop because it
> doesn't find any induction variables. So basically this is highlighting th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84612
Bug ID: 84612
Summary: Overload resolution of operator* fails for
valarray
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #4 from Kai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84611
Bug ID: 84611
Summary: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:826
(local_class_index())
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610
Bug ID: 84610
Summary: internal compiler error: in
synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at
cp/parser.c:38843
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86-*-*|i?86-*-*, x86-64
--- Comment #20 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576
--- Comment #5 from Vegard Nossum ---
I have another testcase which crashes in a similar way, but I'm not sure if
it's the same underlying bug or not:
void a() {
enum * {
[] (union {})
};
}
The original crash was:
(gdb) run
Starting pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83871
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 28 09:43:10 2018
New Revision: 258059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83871
PR c++/83503
* g++.dg/ext/attr-warnin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 28 09:43:10 2018
New Revision: 258059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83871
PR c++/83503
* g++.dg/ext/attr-warni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Santos ---
You are AWESOME!! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 28 08:59:15 2018
New Revision: 258057
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258057&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/83917
* configure.ac (AS_HIDDEN_DIRECTIVE): AC_DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
-finline-limit is a deprecated way to affect inlining, please don't expose it
further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609
Bug ID: 84609
Summary: internal compiler error: in
cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Depe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
101 - 193 of 193 matches
Mail list logo