https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Nov 3 07:59:32 2019
New Revision: 277750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR 79274
The solution for initialising global TLS v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Nov 3 08:23:33 2019
New Revision: 277751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR 79274
The solution for initialising global TLS v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92335
Bug ID: 92335
Summary: missed transformation to branchless
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92336
Bug ID: 92336
Summary: cross compiling gcc fails in gm2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
ble-languages=c --disable-nls CFLAGS=-O0 CXXFLAGS=-O0
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.0 20191103 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 47159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47159&action=edit
bug.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #7)
> Not sure if it's the same bug or not, but I get the same error building GHC
"unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS'"
... kind of errors are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804
--- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Nov 3 12:09:26 2019
New Revision: 277752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgcc/
PR libgcc/78804
* fp-bit.h: Remove FLOAT_BIT_ORDER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337
Bug ID: 92337
Summary: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning
in glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288
JD changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t at sharklasers dot com
--- Comment #3 from JD --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer ---
Note: 31-bit s390 and 32-bit powerpc also match the triggering conditions, and
glibc fails to build there, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92039
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
*** Bug 92337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 92337, which changed state.
Bug 92337 Summary: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds below array bounds warning in
glibc stdlib/strtod_l.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92337
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92338
Bug ID: 92338
Summary: double/float thought (ambiguous) candidate for C-array
index. (Non numeric types aren't.)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92339
Bug ID: 92339
Summary: ice at cp/typeck.c:1510
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92339
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92334
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 92334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92334
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340
Bug ID: 92340
Summary: Qualifiers check fails when inside template
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340
--- Comment #1 from ercli at ucdavis dot edu ---
Created attachment 47162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47162&action=edit
Compiler generated file using -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92340
--- Comment #2 from ercli at ucdavis dot edu ---
Created attachment 47163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47163&action=edit
Compiler generated file using -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92338
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I believe GCC is right, as unhelpful as that might seem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77622
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 88565, which changed state.
Bug 88565 Summary: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 88565, which changed state.
Bug 88565 Summary: enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Nov 3 22:11:37 2019
New Revision: 277758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/88565 - enhance -Warray-bounds for C++ trailing class member arrays
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87192
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 87192, which changed state.
Bug 87192 Summary: -Warray-bounds (even =2) does not work on struct members
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87192
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 3 22:33:53 2019
New Revision: 277760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-11-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92133
* trans-decl.c (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82612
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92341
Bug ID: 92341
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a
compound literal
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92341
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
Bug ID: 92342
Summary: [10 Regression] a small missed transformation into
x?b:0
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
--- Comment #5 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4)
> Author: tkoenig
> Date: Sun Nov 3 22:33:53 2019
> New Revision: 277760
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2019-11-03 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92343
Bug ID: 92343
Summary: [[likely]]/[[unlikely]] prevent method from being a
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92343
--- Comment #1 from Darrell Wright ---
On compiler explorer this affects 9.1/9.2/trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #1)
> Hi,
> I reverted Segher's commit in my local tree, but am still seeing the same
> code-gen for g().
Oops I was modifying wrong branch :-/
I ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2)
> Oops I was modifying wrong branch :-/
> I can confirm reverting the commit fixes this issue.
> Sorry for the noise.
Funny, I had did the same :).
ass: vect
b422bdcb.c: In function 'us':
b422bdcb.c:5:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
5 | us (int sk, int jx)
| ^~
0xc78c56 crash_signal
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191103/work/gcc-10-20191103/gcc/toplev.c:326
0xea2eef vec<_stmt_vec_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92344
Bug ID: 92344
Summary: Missing considering fre optimization of vector load in
auto-vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92346
Bug ID: 92346
Summary: gcc mis-compute the side effect of inline assembly and
produce code with unexpected output
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 4 07:39:21 2019
New Revision: 277766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-11-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92113
* ChangeLog: Fix P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92346
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92133
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277760&root=gcc&view=rev should have been for
this PR.
53 matches
Mail list logo