))
"/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20231112/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14.0.0/include/ia32intrin.h":262:10
70 {*pushfldi2}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 17 flags)
(nil)))
(insn 12 11 20 2 (set (reg:DI 102)
(mem:DI (post_inc:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)) [0 S8 A8]))
"/opt/compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112470
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to John Dong from comment #3)
> ping ?
You posted the bug after the close of business on Friday (end of the week) and
the next week is just starting now on Monday. Europe is waking up now and the
US
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com |
--- Comment #15 from Tamar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|xry111 at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ba7529ee3974667a8e68d089b606ac2fb159415
commit r14-5377-g7ba7529ee3974667a8e68d089b606ac2fb159415
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Sun Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a0c302d2d721b9650c1e354695dbba87364c334
commit r14-5376-g5a0c302d2d721b9650c1e354695dbba87364c334
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
What about this patch:
```
diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
index 69d87579d9c..f3745d86aea 100644
--- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
+++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
@@ -4392,7 +4392,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112470
--- Comment #3 from John Dong ---
(In reply to John Dong from comment #0)
> Hi, after the CVE-2023-4039 patch is installed, the code size and
> performance are affected after stack protection is enabled.
> Refer to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112506
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
The stack trace for the "expecting a DefImp symbol" error is the following:
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 2.1
* frame #0: 0x00010004a240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112506
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-apple-darwin21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112506
Bug ID: 112506
Summary: gm2 test failures on x86_64-apple-darwin21
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112504
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112476
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112504
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICE checking because this checking is only enabled if checking is enabled:
3313gcc_checking_assert (!(flags & OEP_ADDRESS_OF));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112476
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b88500e0bc1e9e3a396ba764f9b701d22a76818f
commit r14-5374-gb88500e0bc1e9e3a396ba764f9b701d22a76818f
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Sun Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0, 11.4.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Bug ID: 112505
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
build_vector_from_val, at tree.cc:2104
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112504
Bug ID: 112504
Summary: gcc: 14: internal compiler error: in operand_equal_p,
at fold-const.cc:3313
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||141242068 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||141242068 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112503
Bug ID: 112503
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
at gsi_start_edge(edge_def*)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112502
Bug ID: 112502
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
get_predictor_value, at predict.cc:2695
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112501
Bug ID: 112501
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.cc:2804
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112500
Bug ID: 112500
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in expand_asm_stmt,
at cfgexpand.cc:3419
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499
Bug ID: 112499
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: output_operand:
invalid expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|moxie-elf |moxie-elf, cris-elf,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #43 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I would expect allowing larger offsets before reload to be a significant
problem.
The core issue is integer memory operations allow 14 bits while FP only allows
5. During reloading we don't know if any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well clang does not implement CWG2369 resolution.
Which GCC implemented in r11-2774 . So it might be that is the reason why GCC
rejects it and clang does not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE internal compiler |ICE internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #42 from John David Anglin ---
The problem is we are limiting displacements to five bits in
pa_legitimate_address_p. The comment is somewhat confusing but
we may have reload issues if we allow 14-bit displacements before
reload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112498
--- Comment #2 from Ingo Josopait ---
Yes, you are right. It is confusing, though. Maybe the warning message should
mention that it is actually invalid code. It looked more like a suggestion to
me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56566
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56566=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56565
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56565=edit
unreduced testcase
Ok, with this preprocessed source I am able to reproduce it locally.
I have not looked into what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I tried `--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0` and it still
does not ICE.
The exact command line I tried:
```
[apinski@xeond2 upstream-gcc-match]$ ~/upstream-gcc-match/bin/gcc t.cc -DICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is interesting, I cannot reproduce it locally with
r14-5371-g93e92b2e5d6866 .
but with the version in godbolt I could (r14-5368-ge0787da263322f).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111874
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #12 from Roger Sayle ---
Patch proposed (actually two alternatives proposed) at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636203.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108473
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112380
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #10)
>
> I'm testing a patch.
Did you get anywhere in the end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112498
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112498
Bug ID: 112498
Summary: std::is_convertible::value returns
false
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112472
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110262
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111638
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100165
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56564
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56564=edit
Full testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112431
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It has failed since __writeeflags/__readeflags was added in 4.9.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56563=edit
Partial testsuite fixes
This patch contains obvious fixes to 3 testcases, except for
assumed_rank_9.f90,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |xry111 at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
*** Bug 112484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112484
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I need some code generation help for gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c, I have a
> patch where we now generate:
> ```
> movq(%rdi,%rax,8), %rax
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110790
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I need some code generation help for gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c, I have a
patch where we now generate:
```
movq(%rdi,%rax,8), %rax
shrq%cl, %rax
andl$1, %eax
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.5.0
Summary|[14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> Yeah, that fold-rtx code is bogus. It's a latent bug.
>
> Optimizing copysign(x, -y) to neg(x) is just wrong.
>
> Will you be sending a patch Xi or do you want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.2.0
Summary|GCC: 14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||141242068 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110390
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3)
> Fixed by r14-3414-g0cfc9c953d0221:
That almost definitely just made the issue go latent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|loongarch64-linux-gnu |loongarch64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110390
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed by r14-3414-g0cfc9c953d0221:
0cfc9c953d0221ec3971a25e6509ebe1041f142e is the first new commit
commit 0cfc9c953d0221ec3971a25e6509ebe1041f142e
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date: Thu Aug 17 12:34:59 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
This failure means the stage1 and stage2 compilers generated different code for
the same input.
So when I need to debug this I usually start by first getting that source code.
Based in the title of this
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
