http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687
Lassi Tuura lat at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687
--- Comment #4 from Lassi Tuura lat at cern dot ch 2011-10-11 12:00:47 UTC ---
Right, as far as I can tell at the moment visibility option is somewhat
peripheral to the issue. The main difference you see with LTO vs. no LTO
appears to be whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48384
Lassi Tuura lat at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #1 from lat at cern dot ch 2011-04-14 07:53:27 UTC ---
For completeness I didn't look for unwind inaccuracies with half-register
writes other than the exact form (v)movd %xmmN,%ebp. It's entirely possible
this bug happens only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
--- Comment #8 from Lassi Tuura lat at cern dot ch 2011-04-15 05:40:33 UTC ---
I confirm glibc 2.13 built with gcc 4.6.1 20110408 snapshot patched with
gcc46-pr48597.patch results in correct unwind info for __ieee754_lgammaf_r. I
checked all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597
Summary: x86-64 unwind register save location misses
half-register write?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: lat at cern dot ch
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet
--- Comment #2 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=20174)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20174action=view)
Random C source file for testing
Random C source file for additional testing. Compile on Linux with and without
--- Comment #3 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:54 ---
Ah, that would explain it. Does it mean that all omissions and inaccuracies in
unwind information are bugs? Like the lack of unwind info for thunks?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43498
--- Comment #5 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:58 ---
OK, reopening bug then.
--
lat at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 19:04 ---
Changing subject to be more descriptive of the actual bug.
--
lat at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo