Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf at noclue dot notk.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48136
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48136&action=edit
test program.c
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf at noclue dot notk.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48157&action=edit
test program.c
This looks like a regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94436
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRME
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf at noclue dot notk.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hello,
I think I've run into a false positive on this file:
https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-atf/tree/pla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106920
--- Comment #2 from Dominique Martinet ---
Thanks for the very fast reply!
since you mentioned null pointers I now see this warning doesn't happen if I
try with a larger constant, I just had bad luck that imx-atf uses an address <
4k...?
I ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106920
--- Comment #5 from Dominique Martinet ---
hmm this is a pretty complex topic.
My problem like pointed out in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 is more with all the legacy
code that I have to deal with, that isn't maintained by
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf at noclue dot notk.org
Target Milestone: ---
Inlining both the reproducer and fanalyzer warning as they are small enough:
--
#include
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf@noclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217
--- Comment #5 from Dominique Martinet ---
Ah, this apparently needed the unused fields in the struct, and the extra
config_init() call.
Here's something trimmed down from the actual program instead of building back
up:
-
#define _POSIX_C_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217
--- Comment #10 from Dominique Martinet ---
Thank you for this work! I can confirm this indeed fixed the warning in my
application as well, time to add a fanalyzer build to my CI :)
11 matches
Mail list logo