http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #10 from Perry Smith 2013-01-31 05:50:00
UTC ---
Can you keep the libraries like you have them with the functions and private
structures for the functions coming from the library but just put the
definition of __dso_handle in c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
--- Comment #6 from Perry Smith 2012-12-09 05:40:28
UTC ---
If it helps, here are the last messages from the make log:
checking for powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0-gcc... /usr/work/build/gcc.git/./gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/work/build/gcc.git/./gcc/ -B
/gs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
--- Comment #4 from Perry Smith 2012-12-09 04:45:47
UTC ---
I can't remember much about this. Things may have changed since I reported it.
Is the Makefile created as the last step?
If not, then if something fails after the Makefile is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55105
Bug #: 55105
Summary: use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH incorrect for AIX -- cause
trunk build to fail
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
--- Comment #2 from Perry Smith 2012-10-26 15:31:27
UTC ---
To be clear, the error during configuration is not what the bug report is
about. The discussion of the error can be seen here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00380.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55083
Bug #: 55083
Summary: failure while configuring libatomic is not cleaned up
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #4 from Perry Smith 2012-09-17 14:18:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> To be included the patch needs to be against trunk.
I don't mind trying to redo this against trunk but I need some help learning
how to build against the trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #2 from Perry Smith 2012-09-16 14:40:25
UTC ---
Forgot to mention. A long thread discussing the issue, etc is here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg65140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #1 from Perry Smith 2012-09-16 14:39:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 28201
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28201
Educational program demonstrating when atexit is used.
Run it without an argument, the function that d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
Bug #: 54601
Summary: AIX uses atexit which causes unloading of shared
modules to break
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #19 from Perry Smith 2011-04-07 12:55:19
UTC ---
Yes. Thats the one.
Dave,
First, I believe this link is a public facing interface to "Fix Central"
http://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/
(it came from google). If not, post back,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #15 from Perry Smith 2011-03-23 19:31:18
UTC ---
Let me try and recap.
The initial report was that 5.3 TL10 did *not* have the error. I discovered
that 5.3 TL10 SP03 does. See [1].
APAR IZ81343[2] and its sister APARs ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #13 from Perry Smith 2011-03-23 13:26:10
UTC ---
On Mar 23, 2011, at 2:47 AM, michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
>
> --- Comment #11 from Michael Haubenwallner dot at>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #10 from Perry Smith 2011-03-18 18:57:07
UTC ---
IZ81343 (or one of its sister APARs) fixes the original issue. But, it leaves
a new issue. The new error looks like:
ld: 0711-596 SEVERE ERROR: Object expand.o
An RLD for sec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #8 from Perry Smith 2011-03-18 17:10:32
UTC ---
It appears that this not a "gcc" bug but an AIX bug. There is one change but
more changes are needed. I'll try to update when I know more. Expect it to be
a week or so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
Perry Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedzsan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
--- Comment #9 from pedzsan at gmail dot com 2010-05-17 20:05 ---
The general reply to this was "your GCC was not compiled for your system".
That isn't the case. I have two compiles on two different systems. One if
version 4.5.0 and the other version is 4.3.1 compiled
17 matches
Mail list logo