--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06
---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06
---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06
---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:00
---
Subject: Bug 45678
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 17 09:00:23 2010
New Revision: 164356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164356
Log:
2010-09-17 Richard Guenther
PR mi
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 14:55
---
Like
Index: gimplify.c
===
--- gimplify.c (revision 164333)
+++ gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -2477,10 +2477,13 @@ gimplify_call_expr (tree *expr_p
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 14:22
---
The patch in comment #4 makes memcpy folding not lie about alignment.
cfgexpand still lies about alignment though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45678
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 14:13
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #13)
>
> > With that patch the assignment generated from memcpy doesn't need more
> > that int alignment, but still cfgexpand.c sets DECL_A
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 13:39
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=21809)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21809&action=view) [edit]
> > patch to fix
--- Comment #27 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 11:07
---
Fixed for trunk sofar.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 11:06
---
Subject: Bug 45623
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 16 11:06:25 2010
New Revision: 164333
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164333
Log:
2010-09-16 Richard Guenther
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 10:50 ---
Missing some else indeed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45678
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 10:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=21809)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21809&action=view)
patch to fix "half STRICT_ALIGNMENT" targets memcpy folding
Might need this patch to f
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 10:17 ---
DECL_ALIGN of d is set to 128 (but appearantly it isn't ensured it'll end up
that way). DECL_ALIGN is adjusted here:
Old value = 32
New value = 128
expand_one_stack_var_at (decl=0x75ae90a0, offset=-
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 09:30 ---
With seeing .clone in fn names I suppose this is ipa-cp or ipa-sra.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45680
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:59
---
Created an attachment (id=21801)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21801&action=view)
patch
I am testing this patch (for 4.5 branch).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45623
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:50
---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Another workaround is to use -fno-tree-pta.
>
> Doesn't work here.
For the original code? Then your reduced testcase is differe
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:24
---
Another workaround is to use -fno-tree-pta.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45623
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:03
---
points-to analysis does not honor GCCs type-punning through union extension
(it works on x86_64 because ptr and asBits match in size and thus SRA
cleans the code up before pointer-analysis). So PTA sees
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 12:31
---
You are accessing a pointer of type char *s1 via an lvalue of type void *
(*data). Or speaking in C++, you are accessing an object of dynamic type
void * (stored to via *data) by an lvalue of type char * (s1
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 12:16
---
Confirmed and investigating.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 09:49 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 09:49 ---
Another dumping artifact probably. At some point I'd like to dump all
MEM_REFs as MEM[(...)p + cst] and drop the fancy ways.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45673
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45663
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 09:47 ---
We can't hoist invariant control flow. Also print *,c is surely thought
to be an escape point for c and thus may clobber it.
I'd rate this impossible to do for the middle-end (and generally not worth
the
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45667
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45660
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 10:21 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 10:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 10:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 10:19 ---
They also fail on old glibc systems. Nathan, you need to add some
dg-effective-target machinery and check availability of runtime support.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45665
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 10:17
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 16:12 ---
It works for me. I suppose you have older gold with known bugs? I have
GNU gold (GNU Binutils; SUSE:openSUSE 11.1 2.20.51.20091013-0.1) 1.9
Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45651
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45650
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45593
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45569
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 15:53 ---
Looks kindof obvious.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45566
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45363
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45658
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 10:48
---
Should be fixed now.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 10:47 ---
Subject: Bug 45611
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 13 10:47:28 2010
New Revision: 164244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164244
Log:
2010-09-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 09:35 ---
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||ia64-unknown-freebsd9.0
Target Milestone
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45651
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45653
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.5 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression]
|__builtin_popcountl ICEs
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-11 10:51 ---
Please attach head.i here, pastes usually vanish after some time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45647
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 15:35 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 14:38 ---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 14:22 ---
Subject: Bug 44115
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 10 14:22:22 2010
New Revision: 164179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164179
Log:
2010-09-10 Richard Guenther
PR deb
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 13:26 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I see before SLP:
> >
> > :
> > MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D)].a = 0;
> > MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D)].b = 0;
> > MEM[
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45470
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45577
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45593
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45634
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 11:29 ---
Are you really using the fortran-dev branch?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 09:33
---
(In reply to comment #40)
> A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
> taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segfault in |[4.6 Regression] Segfault in
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45630
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44328
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 13:27 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Richard, could you please have a look?
I don't have access to sparc-sun-solaris2*, so I can't bootstrap it (but
at most build a cross cc1).
So please attach a testcas
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:52
---
*** Bug 45589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:52 ---
Was a dup (fixed).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45578 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:51
---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45604
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:47 ---
4.5 prints
t.C:2:13: error: 'A::A' has the same name as the class in which it is declared
3.4
t.C:2: error: `enum A::A' has the same name as the class in which it is
declared
which is nicest. 4.0
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 13:53 ---
#4 0x00b25f5e in fold_const_aggregate_ref (t=0x77f0cc18)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c:1444
1444return build_int_cst_type (TREE_TYPE (t),
(gdb) l
1439
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 11:21 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 11:17 ---
Subject: Bug 45578
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 8 11:17:31 2010
New Revision: 163997
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163997
Log:
2010-09-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 10:42 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > The case that apply here is discussed in point 3:
> > >
> > > #3: ... For a given entit
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 10:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The case that apply here is discussed in point 3:
>
> #3: ... For a given entity, each definition
> must be the same. ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:37 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:36 ---
Confirmed. We have two different array3_real(kind=8) record types that are
not considered compatible. One data pointer member is restrict qualified
while the other one is not.
Why do we have an aggregate
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:22 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:22 ---
Subject: Bug 45590
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 8 09:22:35 2010
New Revision: 163995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163995
Log:
2010-09-08 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:22 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:20 ---
You are violating the ODR.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 15:13 ---
IVOPTs is causing this - when we retain points-to info there we also copy
alignment information, but that is of course bogus.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 15:02 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 12:28 ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 12:28 ---
Subject: Bug 45569
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 7 12:27:45 2010
New Revision: 163947
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163947
Log:
2010-09-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-e
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 11:18 ---
Subject: Bug 45569
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 7 11:17:44 2010
New Revision: 163946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163946
Log:
2010-09-07 Richard Guenther
PR middle-e
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 11:17 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
101 - 200 of 15085 matches
Mail list logo