[Bug testsuite/102905] New: [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102905 Bug ID: 102905 Summary: [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/102843] [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/102886] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-18.c fails starting with r12-4607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102886 Bug ID: 102886 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-18.c fails starting with r12-4607 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/102847] [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The build is indeed once again working on power 7. Thanks!

[Bug testsuite/102861] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-16.c fails after r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102861 Bug ID: 102861 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-16.c fails after r12-4526 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/102860] New: [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860 Bug ID: 102860 Summary: [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after r12-4526 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/102847] [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I reran my bisects on two different systems and both resolved to g:793d2549b173a0a2da6dd20ffc27acb9fd2de73e, r12-4501 as when the builds started failing. r12-4500 worked on both systems.

[Bug bootstrap/102847] New: [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 Bug ID: 102847 Summary: [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug other/102843] New: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 Bug ID: 102843 Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug other/102822] New: [12 regression] 27_io/ios_base/failure/dual_abi.cc failure after r12-4443

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102822 Bug ID: 102822 Summary: [12 regression] 27_io/ios_base/failure/dual_abi.cc failure after r12-4443 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libgomp/102789] [12 regression] libgomp.c++/simd-3.C fails after r12-xxxx for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug libgomp/102789] New: [12 regression] libgomp.c++/simd-3.C fails after r12-xxxx for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789 Bug ID: 102789 Summary: [12 regression] libgomp.c++/simd-3.C fails after r12- for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/102787] New: [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 Bug ID: 102787 Summary: [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/102751] New: [12 regression] new test case cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr102736.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102751 Bug ID: 102751 Summary: [12 regression] new test case cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr102736.c fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/102719] [12 regression] several failures after r12-4337

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/sse4_2-pcmpgtq.c (test for excess errors) Also fails on power 8 & 9.

[Bug testsuite/102720] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-strlen-1.c and ldist-strlen-2.c fail after r12-4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102720 Bug ID: 102720 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-strlen-1.c and ldist-strlen-2.c fail after r12-4234 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/102719] New: [12 regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719 Bug ID: 102719 Summary: [12 regression] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: un

[Bug other/102713] New: [12 regression] Several failures after r12-3273

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102713 Bug ID: 102713 Summary: [12 regression] Several failures after r12-3273 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/102690] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690 Bug ID: 102690 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug testsuite/102688] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c fails after r12-4288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102688 Bug ID: 102688 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c fails after r12-4288 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101853] [12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am still seeing these today with g:a40970cf043553f0ca09a3b7be1c5a949623d915, r12-4318 FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-h

[Bug libgomp/102668] New: [12 regression] several libgomp alloc test case failures after r12-3976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102668 Bug ID: 102668 Summary: [12 regression] several libgomp alloc test case failures after r12-3976 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/102658] New: [12 regression] Many test case failures after r12-4240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658 Bug ID: 102658 Summary: [12 regression] Many test case failures after r12-4240 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libgomp/102628] New: [12 regression] New test case libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-9.c fails after its introduction in r12-4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102628 Bug ID: 102628 Summary: [12 regression] New test case libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-9.c fails after its introduction in r12-4033 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug fortran/102500] [12 regression] Missing include for gfortran.dg/include_15.f90 in r12-3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102500 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is no longer failing for me. Thanks!

[Bug testsuite/102509] New: [12 regression] new test case gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method.c is unresolved after r12-3901

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102509 Bug ID: 102509 Summary: [12 regression] new test case gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method.c is unresolved after r12-3901 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug testsuite/101269] [12 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/102501] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-3876

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102501 Bug ID: 102501 Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-3876 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/102500] New: [12 regression] Missing include for gfortran.dg/include_15.f90 in r12-3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102500 Bug ID: 102500 Summary: [12 regression] Missing include for gfortran.dg/include_15.f90 in r12-3722 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug target/102372] New: [12 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_1.f90 after r12-3482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102372 Bug ID: 102372 Summary: [12 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_1.f90 after r12-3482 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug testsuite/102282] New test cases in r12-3320 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102282 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/102282] New: New test cases in r12-3320 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102282 Bug ID: 102282 Summary: New test cases in r12-3320 fail Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug target/102154] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3277-gd2874d905647a1d146dafa60199d440e837adc4d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154 --- Comment #19 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This also prevents gcc from being built if it includes go on powerpc LE: libtool: compile: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/gccgo -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/ -B/home/s

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The stack limit test case mostly has worked since just after this was opened (one short span where it failed again) but I don't know what fixed it. The other test case has worked fine since just

[Bug target/102146] New: [11 regression] several test cases fails after r11-8940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146 Bug ID: 102146 Summary: [11 regression] several test cases fails after r11-8940 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug ipa/102081] [12 regression] ICE building compiler starting with r12-3159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug ipa/102081] New: [12 regression] ICE building compiler starting with r12-3159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081 Bug ID: 102081 Summary: [12 regression] ICE building compiler starting with r12-3159 Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/102069] New: [12 regression] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr101145_3.c in r12-3136 fails on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102069 Bug ID: 102069 Summary: [12 regression] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr101145_3.c in r12-3136 fails on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug fortran/101997] New: [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 Bug ID: 101997 Summary: [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326 Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug analyzer/101980] New: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980 Bug ID: 101980 Summary: [12 regressions] many test case failures after r12-3002 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug testsuite/101969] [10 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101969 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 regression] reactivated |[10 regression] reactivated

[Bug testsuite/101969] New: [12 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101969 Bug ID: 101969 Summary: [12 regression] reactivated test case gcc.dg/pr78213.c in r12-10042 fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug testsuite/101963] New: New test case gfortran.dg/nothing-1.f90 in r12-2992 doesn't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101963 Bug ID: 101963 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/nothing-1.f90 in r12-2992 doesn't compile Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101902] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/uninit-1.C has excess errors after r12-2898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101902 Bug ID: 101902 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/uninit-1.C has excess errors after r12-2898 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101853] [12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug testsuite/101866] New: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/random/randint.cc fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866 Bug ID: 101866 Summary: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/random/randint.cc fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug testsuite/101847] New: [12 regression] linker errors after r12-2808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101847 Bug ID: 101847 Summary: [12 regression] linker errors after r12-2808 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tes

[Bug testsuite/101782] New: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 Bug ID: 101782 Summary: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug other/101694] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails after r12-2591 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101694 Bug ID: 101694 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails after r12-2591 for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug testsuite/101678] New: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Bug ID: 101678 Summary: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug testsuite/101654] New: [12 regression] new test case UNRESOLVED problem in r12-2524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101654 Bug ID: 101654 Summary: [12 regression] new test case UNRESOLVED problem in r12-2524 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101647] New: [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647 Bug ID: 101647 Summary: [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug testsuite/101646] New: [12 regression] excess errors after r12-2533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101646 Bug ID: 101646 Summary: [12 regression] excess errors after r12-2533 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tes

[Bug other/101568] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C fails after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101568 Bug ID: 101568 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr82352.C fails after r12-2338 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug testsuite/101531] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 Bug ID: 101531 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug testsuite/101528] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Bug ID: 101528 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug other/101520] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101520 Bug ID: 101520 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr93658.c has excess errors after r12-2338 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/101461] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-load-builtin_vec_xl test cases fail after r12-2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101461 Bug ID: 101461 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-load-builtin_vec_xl test cases fail after r12-2266 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Sta

[Bug middle-end/101457] New: [12 regression] new test cases in r12-2300 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101457 Bug ID: 101457 Summary: [12 regression] new test cases in r12-2300 fail Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/101444] New: [12 regression] cc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails after r12-2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101444 Bug ID: 101444 Summary: [12 regression] cc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails after r12-2266 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug other/101381] New: [12 regression] missing warning in g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-20.C after r12-2132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101381 Bug ID: 101381 Summary: [12 regression] missing warning in g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-20.C after r12-2132 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug testsuite/101269] New: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269 Bug ID: 101269 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c fails with its introduction in r12-1852 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug middle-end/101216] New: [12 regression] setjmp/longjmp excess errors after r12-1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101216 Bug ID: 101216 Summary: [12 regression] setjmp/longjmp excess errors after r12-1805 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just tried with current trunk: g:e0672017370b9a9362fda52ecffe33d1c9c41829, r12-1813 make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90" FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O

[Bug testsuite/101114] new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- To be complete this shows up as two failures: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c execution test

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 101201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/101201] [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101201 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/101201] New: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101201 Bug ID: 101201 Summary: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c fails on BE after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug testsuite/101169] New: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101169 Bug ID: 101169 Summary: [12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-char.p7.c fails after r10-9880 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Statu

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there is another similar error compiling a different test case traced to the same revision. And these are occurring on more than just power 10s. Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build

[Bug other/101157] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Bug ID: 101157 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/101153] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101153 Bug ID: 101153 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c fails after r12-1605 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c/101122] ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug testsuite/101114] New: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114 Bug ID: 101114 Summary: new test case libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c fails after its introduction in r12-1565 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/101112] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112 Bug ID: 101112 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1551 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/101110] New: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110 Bug ID: 101110 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101104] New: test case g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104 Bug ID: 101104 Summary: test case g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug analyzer/101082] new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101082 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, crud. I picked the wrong test case to look at. If I'd searched on gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c I would have seen that other PR.

[Bug analyzer/101082] New: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101082 Bug ID: 101082 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c from r12-1303 fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/101020] New: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020 Bug ID: 101020 Summary: [12 regression] Several test case failures after r12-1316 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug bootstrap/101005] New: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-1342

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101005 Bug ID: 101005 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap failure after r12-1342 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/101003] New: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003 Bug ID: 101003 Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after r12-1329 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also, this test FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test only fails on power 10.

[Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 Bug ID: 100952 Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug testsuite/100943] New: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943 Bug ID: 100943 Summary: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256 fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -fdiag

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50922&action=edit assembler file

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It does not fail on LE.

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine. g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compil

[Bug bootstrap/100820] New: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Bug ID: 100820 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug testsuite/100750] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are also some failures with gcc 11 including on power 10 LE. FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-3.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.ta

[Bug other/100759] [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- actually, there are a bunch of failures from this revision: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C -Os (internal compiler error) FAIL: g

[Bug other/100759] New: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100759 Bug ID: 100759 Summary: [12 regression] ICE for g++.dg/torture/pr81360.C after r12-1039 at gcc/options-save.c:13626 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100750] New: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 Bug ID: 100750 Summary: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I do see it failing on at least one powerpc64 LE machine. PR97944 said it used to fail randomly.

[Bug testsuite/100749] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Bug ID: 100749 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/100748] New: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Bug ID: 100748 Summary: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100569] [12 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c has lto warnings after r12-742

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there were a LOT of new warnings and such: previous run: g:227a2ecf663d69972b851f51f1934d18927b62cd, r12-741: 52 failures this run: g:7d7d925d0d799eb9dda4a6bd6162af0a7db9c98b, r12-742: 23

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >