--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:53 ---
I cannot reproduce the ICE on trunk at 125915, and i686-linux.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:49 ---
I cannot reproduce this bug on trunk rev.125915, on i686-linux.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:40 ---
I cannot reproduce the ICE on trunk at 125915, on i686-linux
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686,
-ftree-vectorize)
I fail to see what changes. Both before and after applying my patch
the assembly diff is the same. I cannot reproduce the bug
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 07:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686,
-ftree-vectorize)
It is not the vectorizer that is in fault here: applying my patch does
not impact the output of -fdump-tree-vect-all-all except
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 21:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Complete program optimized away (i686,
-ftree-vectorize)
Thanks for pointing me to this bug. I'll have a look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32457
--- Comment #30 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 21:25 ---
Subject: Bug 20623
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jun 21 21:25:27 2007
New Revision: 125929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125929
Log:
PR middle-end/20623
* tree.h (debug_fold_
--- Comment #29 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 20:55 ---
Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with
--enable-checking=fold
So,
the last patch bootstrapped, and tests passed with exactly the same fails
as on trunk. I'm going to commit that pat
--- Comment #26 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 18:21 ---
Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with
--enable-checking=fold
Just to sum it up, and for asking for advice,
attached is the patch that I'm bootstrapping and testing now.
> Anoth
--- Comment #16 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 19590
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jun 21 17:06:05 2007
New Revision: 125925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125925
Log:
PR tree-optimization/19590
* tr
--- Comment #23 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 08:21 ---
Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with
--enable-checking=fold
On 6/21/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The fold_binary change looks unnecessary.
ok.
>
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:45 ---
Subject: Bug 32075
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:44:56 2007
New Revision: 125901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125901
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32075
* tree-da
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:42 ---
Subject: Bug 32075
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:42:28 2007
New Revision: 125900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125900
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32075
* tree-da
--- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:31 ---
Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with
--enable-checking=fold
Hi, here is the final fix for the remaining cases, closing this PR.
Okay for trunk after bootntest on i686-linux with default
--- Comment #17 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 22:58 ---
Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with
--enable-checking=fold
Hi,
The following patch fixes a part of the reported testsuite fails.
With this patch we avoid folding the TREE_CHAIN of an
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 18:50 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This depends on PR 22455 now as --enable-checking=fold is broken.
>
With
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:57 ---
Subject: Re: can't determine dependence between p->a[x+i] and p->a[x+i+1]
where x is invariant but defined in the function
The problem has been introduced in version 124927.
@@ -318
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 18:35 ---
Subject: Bug 32367
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jun 19 18:35:39 2007
New Revision: 125855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125855
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32367
* tree
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in
build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113
> Ok, thanks. Just to let people know, {{&BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +,
> {0, +, 4}_1}_1 was al
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 19:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in
build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113
The ptrplus patch contains the following code:
*** interpret_rhs_modify_stmt (struct loop
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-17 13:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in
build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:113
{{&BinomialCoefficients[0], +, 4}_1, +, {0, +, 4}_1}_1
does not look good: the left part should be invarian
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 08:24 ---
Subject: Re: -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64
I was still thinking about how to fix this, and the solution seems to me
to not instantiate the initial value of the induction variable if it
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 21:19 ---
Subject: Re: -ftree-vectorize results in internal compiler error on AMD64
On 5/8/07, Sjodin, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, I looked at the code, and the problem is that we hav
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-29 16:21 ---
Subject: Re: Doesn't optimize the following (obvious) sequence
> PRE optimized the "offset" and "stride" variables.
> SCEV doesn't know how to create an offset or step out of these
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 01:09 ---
Subject: Bug 31343
Author: spop
Date: Wed Apr 11 01:09:35 2007
New Revision: 123708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123708
Log:
PR tree-optimization/31343
* tree
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 11:30 ---
Subject: Bug 31183
Author: spop
Date: Fri Mar 16 11:30:48 2007
New Revision: 122988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122988
Log:
PR tree-optimization/31183
* tree-loop-
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 20256
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-e
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 26435
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-end/20256
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 25211
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-end/20256
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 16:01 ---
Subject: Bug 27745
Author: spop
Date: Mon May 29 16:01:16 2006
New Revision: 114205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114205
Log:
PR middle-end/27745
* lambd
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 20256
Author: spop
Date: Wed May 17 14:25:59 2006
New Revision: 113862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113862
Log:
PR middle-end/20256
PR middle-e
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 26435
Author: spop
Date: Wed May 17 14:25:59 2006
New Revision: 113862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113862
Log:
PR middle-end/20256
PR middle-e
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 12:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27332
Author: spop
Date: Wed May 17 12:47:43 2006
New Revision: 113856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113856
Log:
PR middle-end/27332
* tree-loop-
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug 26996
Author: spop
Date: Wed Apr 5 17:25:26 2006
New Revision: 112711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112711
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26996
* tre
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 12:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26996
Author: spop
Date: Wed Apr 5 12:33:06 2006
New Revision: 112700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112700
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26996
* tre
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 09:59 ---
Subject: Bug 26992
Author: spop
Date: Mon Apr 3 09:59:38 2006
New Revision: 112635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112635
Log:
PR bootstrap/26992
* tree-scalar-evo
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 14:08 ---
Subject: Bug 26939
Author: spop
Date: Sun Apr 2 14:08:02 2006
New Revision: 112623
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112623
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26939
* tree
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 17:20 ---
Subject: Bug 26859
Author: spop
Date: Wed Mar 29 17:20:24 2006
New Revision: 112502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112502
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26859
* tree-
701 - 738 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
