https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
Might want to revisit this now that -Wreturn-type is on by default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > Might want to revisit this now that -Wreturn-type is on by default
>
> The other Martin did that; cc-ing him
Sorr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > > Might want to revisit this now that -Wreturn-type is on by defaul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> Well, I guess it's probably too late to go back on it now, but I thought
> warnings enabled by default weren't supposed to have any false positives,
> and this