https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 19 00:10:47 2019
New Revision: 279557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279557=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91165 follow-on tweak
I talked in the PR about possibly stripping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 16 23:25:08 2019
New Revision: 279447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279447=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91165 - verify_gimple ICE with cached constexpr.
It seems we need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Slightly further reduced #c3:
> template constexpr T bar (T c) { return c; }
> template struct S {
> T f;
> U g;
> constexpr S (T c, U h) : f(c), g(h) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
My reduced test-case is probably very similar:
template constexpr _Tp forward(_Tp p1) { return p1; }
template struct A {
_T1 first;
_T2 second;
constexpr A(_T1 p1, _T2 p2) : first(p1), second(p2) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Three months later, still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
11 matches
Mail list logo