https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, this problem went away with r219646. Shall we declare it as fixed or at
least turn into non-regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Note, this problem went away with r219646. Shall we declare it as fixed or
> at least turn into non-regression?
Jakub, the original unreduced test still fails wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Note, this problem went away with r219646.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The #c8 case can be easily fixed:
--- gcc/simplify-rtx.c.jj2015-01-19 09:31:25.0 +0100
+++ gcc/simplify-rtx.c2015-01-21 10:59:03.808280655 +0100
@@ -4589,7 +4589,8 @@ simplify_relational_oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 21 21:59:34 2015
New Revision: 219974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/64511
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation_1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #13 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> The #c0 issue is different (with the reorder_operands call commented out),
...
> That said, I'd like to fix #c8 independently.
Jakub, indeed, #c8 was reduced fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note the stack traces involving do_spec_1 are generally bogus (should be
fixed), those stack traces are from the gcc driver rather than cc1/cc1plus
etc., and are printed because cc1/cc1plus segfaulted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #15 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Note the stack traces involving do_spec_1 are generally bogus (should be
> fixed), those stack traces are from the gcc driver rather than cc1/cc1plus
> etc., and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34527
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34527&action=edit
gcc5-ice-nobt.patch
Untested fix for the undesirable backtrace from driver.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34531&action=edit
gcc5-pr64511.patch
The #c13 testcase can be fixed by the attached patch. Not including the
testcase, as it ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 09:47:51 2015
New Revision: 220031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/64511
* dwarf2out.c (struct dw_loc_descr_node): Add chai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Feb 1 17:32:18 2015
New Revision: 220322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220322&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-O3 -g testcase from PR64817 showing probably the same issue as #c0 with
reorder_operands reverted:
int a, b, d;
void
foo (void)
{
for (b = 0; b < 9; b++)
{
int e;
for (d = 0; d < 5; d++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I went back to r219641, just before the problem disappeared again, installed
the r220031 patch to fix the dwarf2out crash, and compilation completed
sucessfully in 36s. Installing the patch for bug 64817
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |debug
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
22 matches
Mail list logo
