--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-24 20:31 ---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01609.html
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-25 08:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31668
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01609.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 09:32 ---
Subject: Bug 31668
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Apr 25 09:32:21 2007
New Revision: 124147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124147
Log:
fortran/
2007-04-25 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 09:33
---
Fixed on mainline, closing.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 09:35 ---
Fixed. For completeness, I only support PROC_MODULE (for interfaces to external
routines) and not PROC_INTERNAL as there is no way (except VALUE) to make use
of a call-by-value variable.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug