https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Mar 14 18:18:45 2016
New Revision: 234188
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234188&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-03-14 Michael Meissner
Backport from mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Mar 14 09:21:32 2016
New Revision: 234178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234178&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/4507
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Mar 13 23:22:15 2016
New Revision: 234172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/45076
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Mar 13 09:48:20 2016
New Revision: 234168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/45076
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 37938
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37938&action=edit
Proposed test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This PR seems fixed for 4.9.3, 5.3.0, and trunk (6.0). The change occurred
> between revisions r201916 (2013-08-22, broken) and r202111 (2013-08-30).
> Could someone checks that the PR is actually fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> > With 4.7 I get instead of an ICE just the warning:
>
> Same with curent 4.8 trunk:
>
> dynamic_dispatch_6.f03:66:0: note: Skipping target new_periodic_5th_or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10 08:43:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> With 4.7 I get instead of an ICE just the warning:
Same with curent 4.8 trunk:
dynamic_dispatch_6.f03:66:0: note: Skipping target new_pe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
13 matches
Mail list logo