https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> That's a wierd one! I'll take a look later on.
I presume that I have to lay out the common block with the pointer and the
string length variable together? It's the o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Sorry! Wrong PR.
On 8 November 2015 at 11:18, pault at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
>
> --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
> (In r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
Isn't this testcase a demonstration that unused3 and unused4 can be used
outside of m2?
module m1
implicit none
private
interface
modu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---