--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 04:49
---
Changed title to reflect what this is, not really a regression at this point.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-04 04:58 ---
Did you also have a look to the other problem:
print *, nearest(huge(1.0),1.0), nearest(-huge(1.0),-1.0), nearest(huge(1.0d0)
1
Error: Result of NEAREST overflows its kind at (1)
?
--
http://g
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 05:39
---
Yes, I also checked the huge testcase and its all clean now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225
--- Comment #16 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-04 05:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33225
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00176.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 05:44
---
Dominique: The problem in comment 14 is not fixed and I do not think its
related. I will check further though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-04 05:47 ---
> I do not think its related.
I just realized that and I filled PR33296.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 10:22
---
This one can be considered FIXED, I think.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 00:51
---
Subject: Bug 33225
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Sep 5 00:51:18 2007
New Revision: 128114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128114
Log:
2007-03-04 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #21 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-05 09:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missing last digit in some formatted
output (on 32bit targets), per kind write_float
If I am not mistaken, the test case did not go through.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33225
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 01:32
---
Subject: Bug 33225
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 6 01:32:11 2007
New Revision: 128173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128173
Log:
2007-09-06 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10 matches
Mail list logo