--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-14
17:01 ---
Fix checked in.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOL
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-01
22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 20435
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-01 22:11:00
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/gnu/regexp
--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 20:55
---
Proposed patch:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/2416
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435
--- Additional Comments From ziga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 18:06
---
Confirmed. This regular expression makes use of possessive quantifiers (?+, *+,
++, {n,m}+), which gnu.regexp doesn't support currently. I've written some
Mauve test cases[1] for possessive quantifiers and wi