https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45708
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Krauss from comment #0)
> basic_filebuf (and therefore fstream) does not allow you to put a write
> operation directly after a read operation, or vice versa. Instead, the write
> and the
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-17 19:12
---
This is a major redesign in any case, which would change completely the user
experience. Again, please analyze carefully all the discussions which led to
the current design (possibly get in contact with Nathan
--- Comment #2 from potswa at mac dot com 2010-09-17 19:09 ---
ABI bump? Would this require additional data members? I would think it requires
less.
Isn't this at least a duplicate of something?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45708
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-17 19:03
---
Not going to happen, at least not until the very far future, in the occasion of
an ABI bump or a global redesign.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
