http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23
10:11:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
... so this is a build/config issue - or, alternatively, the segment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-23 10:21:38 UTC ---
Yes. Can you please post it to gcc-patches@ and commit it? It's preapproved
as obviously correct. Thx.
A patch has already been submitted by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23
14:07:49 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:07:41 2012
New Revision: 183433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183433
Log:
PR lto/51916
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 10:34:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
... so this is a build/config issue - or, alternatively, the segment name can
be specified as above since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-20
16:09:11 UTC ---
I don't have a Darwin machine on which to test the link sequence. Do you mind
finding out which is the fcode in question? It is a matter of setting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2012-01-20
16:25:19 UTC ---
No luck!-(I get 'No symbol fcode in current context.' and if not 'value
optimized out').
The only things I have been to print stepping through
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-20
19:15:08 UTC ---
Try building the compiler without optimization (-O0).
I have never done that!-(I guess I have to pass something like CFLAGS and
CXXFLAGS in configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2012-01-20
20:03:09 UTC ---
I have never done that!-(I guess I have to pass something like CFLAGS and
CXXFLAGS in configure or make). What is the official way to do it?
From the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
13 matches
Mail list logo
