https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #66 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Tue Jan 27 17:07:24 2015
New Revision: 220179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
fix for PR middle-end/57748
Modified:
bra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #65 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #64)
> (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #63)
> > The backport request has been posted:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02192.htm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #64 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #63)
> The backport request has been posted:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02192.html
OK, fine.
If you want I can commit that for you now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #63 from Mikael Pettersson ---
The backport request has been posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02192.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #62 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #61)
> if you already have used/tested that patch on 4.8 for such a long time,
> I would appreciate it very much if you post it on the gcc-patches mailing
> list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #61 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #60)
> FWIW I've been including backports of r202778 and r206437 (which I think are
> the two relevant fixes) in my 4.8-based GCCs on x86_64, sparc64, powerpc64,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Known to fail|4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #58 from Bernd Edlinger ---
IIRC it was first fixed in 4.9.0.
The known to fail above includes 4.9.0 but that is wrong.
Do you think this is still worth to be fixed in 4.8.5 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #57 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #56)
> GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
If it's too late to backport this to 4.8 we might as well close this off
targeting it for 4.9.
Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #56 from Jakub Jelinek
12 matches
Mail list logo