https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
Alexander Ivchenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aivchenk at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
What does "bootstrap with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx" mean? Any instruction
on how to reproduce?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
>
> --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> What does "bootstrap with -fcheck-point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
>
> > TARGET_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds" TARGET_CXXFLAGS="-O2
> -g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds" BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -mmpx
> -fcheck-pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
>
> --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> Any reason why non-C-family languages cannot use MPX?
>
> Richard.
There is no fundamental restriction. If someone wants to implement Pointer
Bounds Checke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
>
> --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> I see. I mainly wonder because of LTO which can combine TUs from C
> and Ada and because for example both Fortran and Ada define
> interoperability with C.