--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 18:51
---
> I'm a bit unsure how to test this right now: what I find is that C objects
> have read-only .eh_frame sections and use .cfi* directives, while C++, Java
> and Ada objects have read-write .eh_frame sections and
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 19:23 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 19:04 ---
Subject: Bug 37463
Author: ro
Date: Mon Nov 3 19:03:28 2008
New Revision: 141555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141555
Log:
PR other/37463
* configure.ac (gcc_cv_ld_ro_rw_mix): M
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 16:46 ---
Patch preapproved by Alex:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg01378.html
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-13 10:00 ---
If you have prehistoric assembler which doesn't support .cfi_personality
directive, then .cfi_* directives can't be used for C++.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
--- Comment #8 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-10-07
16:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> I think that we should assemble some C code with CFI directives and see
> whether
> the resulting .e
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 19:41
---
> I'm a bit unsure how to test this right now: what I find is that C objects
> have read-only .eh_frame sections and use .cfi* directives, while C++, Java
> and Ada objects have read-write .eh_frame sections and s
--- Comment #6 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
19:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00195.html
Thanks for the info.
> Now someone need
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:19
---
See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00195.html
Now someone needs to write a configure test for the compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 18:18
---
Yep, same on SPARC.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-30
18:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
I've done some further debugging: contrary to what gdb suggested, the
reason for the abort is the gcc_assert call in unwind-dw2.c
(uw_init_contex
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-09-16
15:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] All Solaris/x86 eh tests fail
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> gas 2.15 is helplessly outdated and buggy. Can you retry with
> -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm ?
Unfortunately, pa
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
14 matches
Mail list logo