http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Sep 18 10:01:40 2013
New Revision: 202682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202682root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com ---
Eg, these attributes are useful too I think:
no_sanitize = disable ALL sanitize checks
sanitize - enable ALL sanitize checks
no_sanitize_{address,undefined,vla...} = disable the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com ---
Please also think of the other -fsanitize= options.