--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-05-17 14:07
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Sorry if it is not belong here. Just a quick question: There are still
> unaligned
> exceptions generated (even by gcc(libgcj) code itself). Should I open a new
> bug
> report or could
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-11 20:39 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
"unaligned access exception"
>
>
> On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote:
>
> > I am trying to find o
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-05
20:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
"unaligned access exception"
On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote:
> I am trying to find out where unaligned poi
On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote:
I am trying to find out where unaligned pointer is came from. Going
couple
functions back I found that it is the address if "unsigned char"
variable
allocated on stack. Should I look at this issue or it might be
possible in
theory and I shou
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-05 20:03 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Should not be some warning to be generated?
>
> There is a warning if going directly from char * to the union pointer but
since you go through a void
> pointer
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05
19:22 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Should not be some warning to be generated?
There is a warning if going directly from char * to the union pointer but since
you go through a void
pointer, the warning is gone.
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-05 19:16 ---
I just extracted it from "dbus" package which I am testing on linux/alpha
platform. There are other packages (mozilla one of them) that started to
generate unaligned access exceptions then built by gcc 4.0.
Should not
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05
19:10 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> gcc version 4.0.0 20050423 (Red Hat 4.0.0-2)
>
> Here is another test case that generates unaligned access exception:
That code is invalid due to the alignment requirements in s
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-05 19:07 ---
gcc version 4.0.0 20050423 (Red Hat 4.0.0-2)
Here is another test case that generates unaligned access exception:
typedef union
{
short i16;
unsigned short u16;
int i3
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-07
21:00 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06
00:32 ---
Subject: Bug 20625
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-06 00:32:37
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-05
23:57 ---
Subject: Bug 20625
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 23:57:02
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
Lo
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
23:14 ---
This has been approved by RTH here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00428.html
Please apply to 4.0 and mainline. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20625
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-01
20:00 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00097.html
--
What|Removed |Added
Key
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-03-30 09:43 ---
It does work for me too.
Thank you for quick fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20625
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-29 21:38
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This patch should fix the problem
Yes, it does. (I haven't tried bootstrapping, though.)
Thanks for fixing this so quickly!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20625
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni
dot cz 2005-03-29 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
"unaligned access exception"
> > This most likely can be reproduced on ia64 too and other targets where
> > alig
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni
dot cz 2005-03-29 20:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
"unaligned access exception"
> This most likely can be reproduced on ia64 too and other targets where
> alignmen
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-29 20:23
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This most likely can be reproduced on ia64 too and other targets where
alignment is needed for some
> loads.
I cannot reproduce it with -mcpu=ev56, though, so maybe it needs a plaform
th
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
20:03 ---
This most likely can be reproduced on ia64 too and other targets where
alignment is needed for some
loads.
The tree which we produce looks like:
:
if (p->c[0] != 0) goto ; else goto ;
:;
D.1133 = *((
20 matches
Mail list logo
