--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Ke
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 14:50 ---
revision 126200 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 18:53 ---
revision 126240 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 20:03 ---
revision 126260 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 20:50 ---
revision 126271 is bad.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 22:39 ---
revision 126264 is bad.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 22:59 ---
revision 126263 is bad. This patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00165.html
is the cause.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-14 15:12 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> revision 126263 is bad. This patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00165.html
>
> is the cause.
>
I meant to say "revision 126263 works."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #8 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 06:57 ---
Assigning this bug to myself, since it seems I caused it.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #9 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 21:33 ---
Subject: Bug 32748
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 15 21:33:32 2007
New Revision: 126662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126662
Log:
2007-07-16 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/32
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 21:35 ---
With the 126662 commit, this should now be fixed, closing.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 14:54
---
The failure is gone, but the cause might just be hidden again (the IL generated
for the realloc looks safe, even with the malloc attribute set).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748
13 matches
Mail list logo