http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #20 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-18
12:22:58 UTC ---
See also http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-gcc-list/2008-12/msg9.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-21
17:30:57 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 17:30:54 2011
New Revision: 175269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175269
Log:
PR target/33049
* config/avr/avr.md (extz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-20
10:50:27 UTC ---
*** Bug 49446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
HotHead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at emailgo dot de
--- Comment #15 from HotH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Wouter van Gulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #13 from Wouter van Gulik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-18
08:06:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 24277
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24277
Proposed patch
Patch that is less fuzzy in its attributes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-17
19:00:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 24265
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24265
Assembler output from 4.7.0 (r173832) with patch applied.
Assembler output from 4.7.0 (r173832)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-17
18:57:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 24264
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24264
Proposed patch.
Proposed Patch (also compatible with older versions of GCC).
The insn needs at
--- Comment #9 from abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com 2010-09-14 06:25
---
Lot better code size in gcc-4.5.0 and above [head]. See the attachment in
comment #8.
--
abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com 2010-09-14 06:23
---
Created an attachment (id=21787)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21787&action=view)
Test case assembler output for 4.5.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--
eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-08-24 20:35
---
Created an attachment (id=14108)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14108&action=view)
Test case assembler output for 4.3.0 20070817 snapshot.
Again, only marginally better.
--
http://gc
--- Comment #6 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-08-24 20:30
---
Created an attachment (id=14107)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14107&action=view)
Test case assembler output for 4.2.1.
Not really any better than 4.1.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #5 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-08-24 20:25
---
Created an attachment (id=14106)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14106&action=view)
Correct assembler output of test case for 4.1.2.
--
eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com changed:
--- Comment #4 from wvangulik at xs4all dot nl 2007-08-24 18:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14105)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14105&action=view)
Assembler output of testcase using 4.1.2
This is the requested assembler output that Eric asked for
--
http://
--- Comment #3 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-08-22 16:57
---
Wouter, please attach the assembly output that you are getting for your test.c
file using 4.1.2. That way we can compare it to other compiler versions.
Thanks,
Eric
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 17:58 ---
It might be interesting if you tried 4.2.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
21 matches
Mail list logo