--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 06:51
---
Can you still provide the preprocessed source?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-12-30 07:11
---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Can you still provide the preprocessed source?
hi,
I was able to solve this issue. this could be closed now.
thanks Andrew for following up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 07:14
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I was able to solve this issue. this could be closed now.
Well there is most likely still an issue -fPIC, even if it is not reproducible
without that -fPIC, it is still a bug that GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 23:36 ---
How did you configure GCC? Do you have CFLAGS set? How did you invoke make?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 23:37 ---
(const:SI (plus:SI (unspec:SI [
(symbol_ref:SI ("set_hash_table")
[flags 0x2] )
] 1)
Should only show up with -fPIC so I think you
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 23:40 ---
*** Bug 36623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36622
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 23:40 ---
*** Bug 36624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36622
--- Comment #5 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-24 23:46
---
(pardon me, I am pretty new for submitting bug reports at this site)
>From the previous note I just received, it looks like I should not be using
fPIC option to compile gcc? is this applicable for both 32 and
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 01:01 ---
>So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct?
Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36622
--- Comment #7 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-25 01:13
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> >So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct?
> Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways?
Hi Andrew,
I have the CFLAGS for 2 reasons:
1. I have
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 01:15 ---
> 1. I have the mpfr and gmp libs in non standard locations, so I want to make
> sure that the gcc install looks at the correct places.
That is what --with-gmp=/--with-mpfr= are for.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #9 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-25 01:18
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > 1. I have the mpfr and gmp libs in non standard locations, so I want to
> > make
> > sure that the gcc install looks at the correct places.
> That is what --with-gmp=/--with-mpfr=
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-26 07:05 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> So, do you think I need to exclude all along '-fPIC' for the other platform
> specific builds of 4.3.1?
I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch for i686-pc-linux-gnu with
CFLAGS="-O2 -fPI
--- Comment #11 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-26 15:58
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > So, do you think I need to exclude all along '-fPIC' for the other platform
> > specific builds of 4.3.1?
> I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-26 17:45 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> > I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch for i686-pc-linux-gnu with
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" and it worked OK. Same with trunk SVN.
>
> How did you fetch the 4.3.1 SVN branch? Do I have to
--- Comment #13 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-26 21:56
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > > I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch for i686-pc-linux-gnu with
> > > CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" and it worked OK. Same with trunk SVN.
> >
> > How did
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-27 07:16 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I just tried the 4.3_branch release of gcc with the CFFLAGS='-02 -fPIC'
> option.
>
> It seem to fail now in libiberty/md5.c
>
> Here is the error:
>
> --snip--
>
> In file included from
--- Comment #15 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-27 08:57
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > I just tried the 4.3_branch release of gcc with the CFFLAGS='-02 -fPIC'
> > option.
> >
> > It seem to fail now in libiberty/md5.c
> >
> > Here is th
--- Comment #16 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-27 09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I did:
>
> >svn co http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/ gcc-4.3
>
> I hope I got the correct copy there, unless I did some wrong.
>
> if you have any suggestions on how t
--- Comment #17 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-01 19:26
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > I did:
> >
> > >svn co http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/ gcc-4.3
> >
> > I hope I got the correct copy there, unless I did some wr
--- Comment #18 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-01 21:17
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (In reply to comment #15)
> > > I did:
> > >
> > > >svn co http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/ gcc-4.3
> > >
> > > I hope I got the
--- Comment #19 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 16:11 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > >So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct?
> > Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways?
> 2. -fPIC has always been set in all the other gcc versio
--- Comment #20 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-02 16:17
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > > >So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct?
> > > Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways?
> > 2. -fPIC has alw
--- Comment #21 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-07-02 16:46
---
Subject: Re: 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.
* imam dot toufique at intel dot com wrote on Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:17:59PM
CEST:
> well... when libstdc and other shared libs are built, are they all built
25 matches
Mail list logo
