http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #25 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 11:01:02 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Sep 7 11:00:52 2012
New Revision: 191068
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191068
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #24 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 10:50:40 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Sep 7 10:50:35 2012
New Revision: 191067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191067
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #23 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:54:11 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:54:08 2012
New Revision: 190971
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190971
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:50:00 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Sep 5 10:49:56 2012
New Revision: 190970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190970
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:36:48 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:36:44 2012
New Revision: 190919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190919
Log:
PR target/45070
* config/arm/arm
--- Comment #19 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 14:05
---
Fixed in all maintained releases.
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #18 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 11:07
---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ibolton
Date: Tue Sep 7 11:07:31 2010
New Revision: 163945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163945
Log:
2010-09-07 Ian Bolton
Backport from mainline
--- Comment #17 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 09:26
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I'd like it backported to 4.4 if possible, thanks
>
Just awaiting approval on the mailing list. It's ready to go.
--
ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #16 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2010-09-04 16:41 ---
I'd like it backported to 4.4 if possible, thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #15 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:05
---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ibolton
Date: Thu Sep 2 13:05:30 2010
New Revision: 163774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163774
Log:
2010-09-02 Ian Bolton
Backport from mainline
--- Comment #14 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 08:28 ---
Subject: Bug 45070
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Aug 19 08:27:59 2010
New Revision: 163367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163367
Log:
For Ian Bolton
2010-08-19 Ian Bolton
PR target/4
--- Comment #13 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-14
16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Any news? :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00894.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #12 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2010-08-14 15:33 ---
Any news? :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #11 from ian dot bolton at arm dot com 2010-08-03 17:13 ---
I have regression-tested the patch for gcc and g++ with target=arm-eabi and
created a regression testsuite case for it, so I expect to be able to submit
both to the mailing list for review in the next day or so.
--
--- Comment #10 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-28 09:45 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I just realized that this is a packed structure and probably need to look up
> the semantics of this in the AAPCS. IIRC the AAPCS states that it doesn't
> support packed structures or bitfields
--- Comment #9 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:34
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I just realized that this is a packed structure and probably need to look up
> the semantics of this in the AAPCS. IIRC the AAPCS states that it doesn't
> support packed structures or bi
--- Comment #8 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks for the analysis, yes that appears to be the nub of the problem with
> the
> result being removed . I see the same problem on trunk -
>
I just realized that this is a packed stru
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 09:01 ---
Thanks for the analysis, yes that appears to be the nub of the problem with the
result being removed . I see the same problem on trunk -
Patches should however be submitted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org after
appropria
--- Comment #6 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-07-28
08:37 ---
'arm_size_return_regs()' returns 2 when generating epilogue for 'next' function
here. And as a result, return value not registered in the mask, causing it to
be clobbered.
Would the following patch be the r
20 matches
Mail list logo