[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-05-24 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #12 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-05-24 11:04 --- (From update of attachment 20731) moved to separated PR44258. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-05-24 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-24 09:43 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > This is now fixed on both the trunk and the 4.5 branch. > > > > this commit produces broken libkhtml.so.5.4.0 from kdelibs-4.4.3. > in details, it produces

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-05-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-05-23 21:25 --- Created an attachment (id=20731) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20731&action=view) parser.i from kdelibs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43846

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-05-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-05-23 11:53 --- (In reply to comment #7) > This is now fixed on both the trunk and the 4.5 branch. > this commit produces broken libkhtml.so.5.4.0 from kdelibs-4.4.3. in details, it produces different/broken binaries for khtml/css/parser.c

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-28 Thread tbptbp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2010-04-28 13:43 --- Allow me to extend to you my most profuse praises and blessing; may all the woman in your vicinity fall pregnant and your male progeny be granted abounding chest hair. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-28 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 13:15 --- This is now fixed on both the trunk and the 4.5 branch. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-28 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 13:10 --- Subject: Bug 43846 Author: jamborm Date: Wed Apr 28 13:09:56 2010 New Revision: 158826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158826 Log: 2010-04-28 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimization/438

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-23 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 14:52 --- Subject: Bug 43846 Author: jamborm Date: Fri Apr 23 14:52:06 2010 New Revision: 158668 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158668 Log: 2010-04-23 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimization/438

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-22 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 17:18 --- Created an attachment (id=20464) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20464&action=view) Proposed fix I'm currently testing this patch and will submit it tomorrow if everything goes OK. -- http:/

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-22 Thread davidxl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from davidxl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 17:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > so it doesn't consider the struct with the array for total scalarization > > for some reason. Martin? > > > > Well, that was a deliberate decision when

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-22 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 12:35 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > so it doesn't consider the struct with the array for total scalarization > for some reason. Martin? > Well, that was a deliberate decision when fixing PR 42585 (see type_consists_of_r

[Bug tree-optimization/43846] [4.5 Regression] array vs members, total scalarization issues

2010-04-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 09:07 --- Hm, frob1 looks like _Z5frob1RK5foo_tRS_: .LFB18: movss (%rdi), %xmm3 movss 4(%rdi), %xmm2 movaps %xmm3, %xmm4 movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 mulss %xmm3, %xmm4 movss 8