http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-12
11:57:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > PR53125 has a testcase where we spend time in redundant store removal in
> > eliminate() which does vn_reference_lookup with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-11
09:34:40 UTC ---
PR53125 has a testcase where we spend time in redundant store removal in
eliminate() which does vn_reference_lookup with VN_WALK (which it should not
need).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-31
13:26:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 26533
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26533
patch
Prototype patch. Passes bootstrap but testing shows some regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52054
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
