[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

2013-06-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benoit.hudson at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

2012-10-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-04 12:46:34 UTC --- > --- Comment #9 from gellert at dkrz dot de 2012-09-25 17:00:22 UTC --- [...] >> I agree that gcc/g++/... not adding needed RPATHs to its runtime libraries

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

2012-09-25 Thread gellert at dkrz dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 gellert at dkrz dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gellert at dkrz dot de

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

2011-07-18 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|