[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:41 --- Fixed on Trunk and 4.4 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:40 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Dec 1 04:40:14 2009 New Revision: 154864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154864 Log: 2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:36 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Dec 1 04:36:30 2009 New Revision: 154863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154863 Log: 2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-27 08:34 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a > simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris > to the test case as recognitio

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 22:11 --- Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris to the test case as recognition. Shall we backport this f

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 21:46 --- The following assert is wrong: gcc_assert (src_info->dimen == 2); (and has been removed in the comment patch of comment 7). I only want to link to an email which gives the reason why. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:10 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 26 19:10:29 2009 New Revision: 154681 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154681 Log: 2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:05 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 26 19:05:37 2009 New Revision: 154680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154680 Log: 2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 17:50 --- Removing the assert appears to fix this. Testing now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 14:35 --- I think we need to gfc_walk_op_expr before we try to gfc_conv_array_transpose -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-11-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 13:02 --- This is what I would call a very fundamental bug, at the soul of what fortran is suppose to do. I am looking at it but think it would go better with a team effort here. Anyone have any thoughts about it? --

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-09-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 16:21 --- Not a regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-09-05 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-05 15:34 --- 853 gcc_assert (src_info->dimen == 2); (gdb) list 848 dest_ss = se->ss; 849 850 src_info = &src_ss->data.info; 851 dest_info = &dest_ss->data.info; 852 gcc_assert (dest_info->dimen == 2); 85

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keyw

[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose

2009-09-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 14:54 --- ICE confirmed with test case on 4.5 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278