--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08
15:07 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22444 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08
15:05 ---
I still get these failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu:
FAIL: 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc (test for excess errors)
C
--
Bug 22416 depends on bug 22444, which changed state.
Bug 22444 Summary: [4.1 regression] testsuite
failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 22416 depends on bug 22444, which changed state.
Bug 22444 Summary: [4.1 regression] testsuite
failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-19
04:17 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-07-18
11:09 ---
After analysising libstdc++.log
For me, the testsuite failure is caused by:
FAIL: 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/haren/alpha-toolchain/gcc-4.1
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-07-18
10:14 ---
I see this with GCC 4.1.0 20050716 snapshot on i686-pc-linux-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:11
---
The failure disappeared again for me on 20050712, but given comments about
uninitialized memory I doubt this indicates a fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22444
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
10:43 ---
I tried to reduce the testcase, but the problem just disappears on
unrelated changes of the code.
A run through valgrind resulted in the following output:
130 % valgrind --tool=memcheck cc1plus -quiet -
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
13 matches
Mail list logo