[Bug fortran/95146] New: gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95146 Bug ID: 95146 Summary: gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P3

[Bug target/95134] Add a target option to avoid libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/95146] gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95146 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- This seems to be a side effect of using -traditional in gfortran see PR 28662 for moving to no traditional. Also gcc -E -traditional shows this behavior of just echoing the strings.

[Bug middle-end/95140] [10/11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow for a loop unrolled past the end of a trailing array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Priority|P3

[Bug target/95046] Vectorize V2SFmode operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4356120ba88c083dd5987376aab7590dd1e0e13 commit r11-409-gf4356120ba88c083dd5987376aab7590dd1e0e13 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri Ma

[Bug c++/95143] SFINAE failure with static_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug c/95145] [8/9/10/11 Regression]internal compiler error: in analyze_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug fortran/95146] gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95146 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Pre ANSI/ISO C (aka K&R C), preprocessor were true preprocessor and always required # in the first column. I think meson should be fixed really to work rather than working around the issue in gfortran.

[Bug fortran/95146] gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95146 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Pre ANSI/ISO C (aka K&R C), preprocessor were true preprocessor and always > required # in the first column. > > I think meson should be fixed really to work rat

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/95146] gfortran -cpp – leading spaces before '#' preprocessing directive not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95146 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/95147] New: Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 Bug ID: 95147 Summary: Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- --disable-cet seems to be a workaround, it looks like the configury fails to check for host compiler support (or alternatively --disable-cet should be the default for stage1?)

[Bug target/95046] Vectorize V2SFmode operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8b0665445bee8673b62c0a40ae257fe8c75a9b6 commit r11-410-gf8b0665445bee8673b62c0a40ae257fe8c75a9b6 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri Ma

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 92611, which changed state. Bug 92611 Summary: auto vectorization failed for type promotation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92611 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/92492] AVX512: Missed vectorization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92492 Bug 92492 depends on bug 92611, which changed state. Bug 92611 Summary: auto vectorization failed for type promotation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92611 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/92611] auto vectorization failed for type promotation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92611 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92658] x86 lacks vector extend / truncate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658 --- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu --- *** Bug 92611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95148] New: -Wtype-limits always-false warning triggered despite comparison being avoided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95148 Bug ID: 95148 Summary: -Wtype-limits always-false warning triggered despite comparison being avoided Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94799] [8/9/10 Regression] Calling a member template function fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/94635] [OpenMP][Offloading] mapping with alloc/delete followed by map(from/tofrom:) fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94635 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f0f7da9aa98eec28b4e5e34ade0aa0028df161d commit r11-412-g9f0f7da9aa98eec28b4e5e34ade0aa0028df161d Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Fri

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aaf1ee48316f9b414b11c17e298198925d816595 commit r11-414-gaaf1ee48316f9b414b11c17e298198925d816595 Author: Richard Biener Date: F

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regr

[Bug pch/95131] Instantiate templates at pch generation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95131 --- Comment #3 from Trass3r --- Well sure but most existing codebases won't be ported to modules because of the effort while enabling pch is now straightforward with latest CMake. These conformance issues have also been identified in https://rev

[Bug c++/95149] New: lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95149 Bug ID: 95149 Summary: lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare]

[Bug c++/95149] lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95149 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/95149] lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95149 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- With string merging even "foobar" + 3 == "bar" (or not, depending on alignment decision, how hard does the linker optimize etc.). For static vars only if -fmerge-all-constants and the var would be const and

[Bug target/95082] LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- But this PR has more info, so I'll close the older one as dup, instead.

[Bug target/95070] vec_cntlz_lsbb implementation uses BE semantics on LE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95070 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org R

[Bug target/95082] LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- *** Bug 95070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/95149] lex.c:1729:8: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95149 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The code here is correct. In that the warning might be valid for normal code but the comparasion it is making is valid one. Mainly because we do: /* Restore backslash followed by newline. */

[Bug sanitizer/94307] Provide a way to declare the *SAN exception handler -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Any update on this Kees?

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška

[Bug libgomp/95150] New: Some offloaded programs crash with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150 Bug ID: 95150 Summary: Some offloaded programs crash with openmp Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgom

[Bug tree-optimization/92260] [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:584a3c080bbd6e64131fa53771c7424bcf9d21fa commit r11-418-g584a3c080bbd6e64131fa53771c7424bcf9d21fa Author: Richard Biener Date: F

[Bug d/94496] [D] Use aggressive optimizations in release mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94496 --- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk --- Also about 'nothrow' and Errors. I would really welcome a flag to compiler that simply terminates all threads immidetly any Error is thrown at throw location. They aren't really recoverable. The only option

[Bug other/67300] -foffload* undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/95151] New: Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151 Bug ID: 95151 Summary: Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug c++/94799] [8/9/10 Regression] Calling a member template function fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- I see :(. I'll take a look, thanks for noticing.

[Bug analyzer/95152] New: internal compiler error: in get_or_create_mem_ref, at analyzer/region-model.cc:6938

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95152 Bug ID: 95152 Summary: internal compiler error: in get_or_create_mem_ref, at analyzer/region-model.cc:6938 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-15 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug analyzer/95152] internal compiler error: in get_or_create_mem_ref, at analyzer/region-model.cc:6938

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95152 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/95153] New: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153 Bug ID: 95153 Summary: Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/95132] Concept checked after auto return type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95132 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153 --- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith --- Forgot to add this is specific to -std=c++20 too.

[Bug preprocessor/94535] __LINE__ value changed for function-like macro invocations spanning multiple lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94535 --- Comment #13 from Alisdair Meredith --- As this has shipped for two releases now (gcc9 and 10) I recommend closing as Works As Designed, citing C standard paper N2322 as reason for the change.

[Bug libgomp/95150] Some offloaded programs crash with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- * You compilation uses "-O0" – I do not know whether that's intended. * I did not see any timeout message although it did take a while to run with offloading. (See timing results below.) I wonder what ca

[Bug c++/95100] xxx_view adaptors don't work with pipeline operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95100 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/95154] New: [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64-*-* spawn -ignore SIGHUP /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20200515/Build/gcc/testsuite/g++3/../../xg++ -B

[Bug fortran/94690] [OpenMP] omp ... distribute – lastprivate not permitted and more issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94690 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ec52417fd9b3bef5227cdc9a18ff4f0247b0ea4 commit r11-421-g0ec52417fd9b3bef5227cdc9a18ff4f0247b0ea4 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Fr

[Bug c++/83028] Incorrect -Wsequence-point warning in correct C++17 code with new evaluation order rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83028 Rafael Avila de Espindola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael at espindo dot la ---

[Bug target/95154] [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95154 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- The problem is that when output_constant processes a FDESC_EXPR it calls ASM_OUTPUT_FDESC, which doesn't do weak processing (it doesn't call assemble_external).

[Bug libgomp/95150] Some offloaded programs crash with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150 --- Comment #2 from Chinoune --- Created attachment 48546 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48546&action=edit debug ouput

[Bug libgomp/95150] Some offloaded programs crash with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150 --- Comment #3 from Chinoune --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > * You compilation uses "-O0" – I do not know whether that's intended. I didn't set any optimization flag, maybe the compiler default to "-O0". > > * I did not see a

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c1a5d8b71e29b71e0bc1004480c12c5fc427cb7 commit r11-422-g4c1a5d8b71e29b71e0bc1004480c12c5fc427cb7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri May 15 09:0

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 --- Comment #3 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- Yes, our build bots use podman, so you can reproduce with: $ git clone https://github.com/scylladb/seastar $ cd seastar $ podman run -v $PWD:$PWD:z -w $PWD -it docker.io/scylladb/scylla-toolchain

[Bug c++/95153] Arrays of 'const void *' should not be copyable in C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95153 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from TC ---

[Bug c++/93286] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: did not expect class ‘type’, have ‘type’ (reference_type) in convert_from_reference, at cp/cvt.c:550 since g:e0d91792eec490d1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93286 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda6396a1b6e6bba2a3b0847931567c3458f2184 commit r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba2a3b0847931567c3458f2184 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fri

[Bug c++/90996] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13495

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90996 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:289fbbe75f6d1c69605fcfde769ac46944c14a4a commit r11-424-g289fbbe75f6d1c69605fcfde769ac46944c14a4a Author: Patrick Palka Date: Fri

[Bug c/87210] [RFE] introduce build time options to zero initialize automatic stack variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87210 --- Comment #6 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, based on the previous discussion on the LLVM option -ftrivial-auto-var-init=[uninitialized|pattern|zero] we can see: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern might not be a good idea due to the fol

[Bug d/95155] New: d: wrong vtable offset in virtual function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95155 Bug ID: 95155 Summary: d: wrong vtable offset in virtual function call Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d

[Bug c++/95156] New: -Wtautological-compare warns in C but not C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95156 Bug ID: 95156 Summary: -Wtautological-compare warns in C but not C++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/95157] New: Missing -Wtautological-compare warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95157 Bug ID: 95157 Summary: Missing -Wtautological-compare warning Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug go/95061] shared libgo library not found when running the testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e478cacb62f116d2c8efdabc4b51e6d2d7041aae commit r11-432-ge478cacb62f116d2c8efdabc4b51e6d2d7041aae Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date:

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- Created attachment 48547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48547&action=edit testcase

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #5 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- With a seastar patched for c++ 20 (mostly dropping a few experimental/ from includes and experimental:: from names), the following is all that is needed: #include #include using namespace seast

[Bug c++/95100] xxx_view adaptors don't work with pipeline operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95100 --- Comment #2 from rhalbersma --- OK, so the rewriting rules [range.adaptors]/4, that make views::xxx(R) equivalent to R | views::xxx, do not allow to rewrite the expression equivalent xxx_view{R} as R | xxx_view? That would be rather finicky, p

[Bug c++/95158] New: Templates + Diamond Inheritance + Final = Pure Virtual Function Call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95158 Bug ID: 95158 Summary: Templates + Diamond Inheritance + Final = Pure Virtual Function Call Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/95155] d: wrong vtable offset in virtual function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95155 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- Looks like fix was in r10-7280, taken from the upstream backport in https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10913

[Bug middle-end/10138] warn for uninitialized arrays passed as const* arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Last reconfirmed|2008-03-30 20:45

[Bug c++/57943] [c++11] invalid decltype expression accepted in template default type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57943 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115232b778943be075fc4df991e03d9387563114 commit r11-434-g115232b778943be075fc4df991e03d9387563114 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Fri

[Bug c++/57943] [c++11] invalid decltype expression accepted in template default type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57943 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95156] -Wtautological-compare warns in C but not C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95156 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/15880] No 'may be used uninitialize' warning for arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15880 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.1.0 Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/95159] New: ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159 Bug ID: 95159 Summary: ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159 --- Comment #1 from Paco Arjonilla --- GCC 10.1, not GCC 10.0.1

[Bug c++/95160] New: Explicit specialization in non-namespace scope bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95160 Bug ID: 95160 Summary: Explicit specialization in non-namespace scope bug Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen