https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104309
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
crayftn 11 & 12 output:
destructor4(complicated) 2*2.
destructor5 (simple2) 5
destructor5 (simple2) 6
destructor2(simple) 2*1
destructor4(complicated) 4., 5.
destructor5 (simple2) -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93482
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52311
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52311=edit
Patch that regtests ok.
The patch suggested by the reporter is rather close to this one.
We need to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems fixed on mainline for gcc-12.
Most likely fix: r12-6557 for pr67804.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> with TRANSFER between different integer kinds. E.g.
oops, that should read: character kinds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue in comment#3 is likely unrelated to TRANSFER:
program p
implicit none
! integer, parameter :: k = 1
integer, parameter :: k = 4
character(kind=k,len=2), parameter :: z = k_"FG"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52138
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52138=edit
Somewhat reduced reproducer
The issue can be reproduced with a few less modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We die here:
(gdb) l 7244
7239case EXPR_ARRAY:
7240
7241 /* This is somewhat brutal. The expression for the first
7242 element of the array is evaluated and assigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
index 3881370d947..366b00c28dd 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
@@ -8162,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative, semi-obvious patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc
index 361907b0e51..7ce7d736629 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The remaining issues in this PR seem to be related to inconsistencies
between expr->representation.string and expr->value.character.string
that occur for non-default character kind that are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 67804, which changed state.
Bug 67804 Summary: ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057478.html
This fixes
gfortran.dg/team_change_1.f90
gfortran.dg/team_number_1.f90
gfortran.dg/popcnt_poppar_2.F90 (-m64, not supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 84787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770
Bug 32770 depends on bug 84787, which changed state.
Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84787, which changed state.
Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 77667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Another reduced testcase:
>
> ! { dg-do run }
> ! { dg-options "-fdefault-integer-8" }
> ! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_integer_16 }
>
> if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, the following fixes the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
index fccf0a9b229..d5564f659f8 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105168
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105182
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #11)
> Remove myself from CC list. I do not have 11.x source tree. Minimum
> example that should have been supplied by someone else.
What options are needed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105182
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I found a machine with 11.2 where I get the ICE.
Likely a duplicate of pr103609 which has been fixed.
If you agree, you may close this one as a duplicate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105184
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111341
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802
Bug 37802 depends on bug 30802, which changed state.
Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with
-fbounds-check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthony.debeus at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766
Bug 27766 depends on bug 30802, which changed state.
Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with
-fbounds-check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93485
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102417
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55821|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexandre.poux at coria dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111321
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #23 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mikael,
are you still onto it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111339
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A workaround is to add a 'private' statement to any of the first two modules.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-September/059756.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111022
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mailling-lists-bd at posteo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111304
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Lightly tested, probably obvious patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
index 136a292807d..536884b13f0 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is
polymorphic, so is (X):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104555
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ASSOCIATE intrinsic does|ASSOCIATED intrinsic does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Potential fix:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.cc b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
index f848e52be4c..9e3571d3dbe 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/match.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
@@ -5064,6 +5064,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97045
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The coarray cases in comment#2 will be rejected with:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
index 1cc65d7fa49..08081dacde4 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
801 - 900 of 2166 matches
Mail list logo