Re: [PATCH] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags

On 11/21/13, 5:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 20 November 2013 23:57, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >> On 11/20/13, 1:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>>> On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags

On 11/20/13, 1:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 20 November 2013 21:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 29 October 2013 15:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>> This patch addresses two issues with the libstdc++ testsuite: >>> >>> * duplicate "-g -O2"

PING: [PATCH] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags

This patch needs a review. Thanks, Cesar

Re: [PATCH] aarch64 gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c failures

On 11/19/13, 1:37 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: > On 18 November 2013 18:02, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > >>>> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this >>>> test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero. >>

Re: [PATCH] aarch64 gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c failures

On 11/18/13, 10:01 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Cesar Philippidis > wrote: >> This patch addresses the failures caused by the >> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this >> test fails is because aarch64

[PATCH] aarch64 gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c failures

This patch addresses the failures caused by the gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero. Is this OK for trunk? If so, please commit it because I do not have an svn account. Thanks, Cesar

Re: [PATCH] Add check for aarch64 in vect_cmdline_needed

On 11/6/13, 5:06 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > You should be testing aarch64*-*-* so as to match aarch64_be targets. Thank you for catching that. Please commit this new patch if is OK. I don't have SVN access. Thanks, Cesar 2013-11-06 Cesar Philippidis gcc/testsuite/

[PATCH] Add check for aarch64 in vect_cmdline_needed

ized 0 loops" 1 Apparently the intent of these particular tests is to ensure that those loops do not get vectorized when the target does not support SIMD. Is this OK for trunk? If so, please commit it since I do not have a SVN account. Thanks, Cesar 2013-11-05 Cesar Philippidis

[PATCH] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags

ot;-g -O2" at minimum when no other optimization flags are specified. The testsuite used to set those flags prior to Benjamin's patch to remove duplicate cxxflags here <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01572.html>. Is this OK for trunk? If so, please apply. Thanks, Cesar 20

Re: [PATCH] libgomp testsuite fixes

On 6/20/13 9:49 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 30, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Cesar Philippidis > wrote: >> Here is a patch from our backlog at Mentor Graphics that addresses a >> libgomp issue where setting ENABLE_LTO=1 in site.exp causes the following >> error with dejagnu

Re: [patch] combine ICE fix

On 10/15/13 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/10/13 10:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:26:43AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>> This patch addresses an ICE when building qemu for a Mips target in >>> Yocto. Both gcc-trunk, gcc-4.8 and all of

Re: [patch] combine ICE fix

but instead the df stuff. I was thinking about converting that array to a vec. But I don't want to touch more code than I have to right now. Is this OK as a stopgap? Thanks for the review! Cesar 2013-10-11 Cesar Philippidis gcc/ * regs.h (REG_N_GROW): New function.

[patch] combine ICE fix

and no regressions showed up. Thanks, Cesar 2013-10-10 Cesar Philippidis gcc/ * regs.h (REG_N_GROW): New function. * combine.c (combine_split_insns): Call REG_N_GROW when new registers are created. Index: gcc/regs.h

[PATCH] if-to-switch pass

fold_binary () inside refine_range_plus (). Also, TODO_ggc_collect has been removed in the gimple_opt_pass struct. I bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and arm-none-linux-gnueabi. OK for trunk? Cesar 2013-06-21 Tom de Vries Cesar Philippidis

Re: [PATCH] ARMv6-M MI thunk fix

Ping. Cesar On 6/7/13 9:50 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > On 6/6/13 9:00 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> The pipeline offset is 4 for Thumb2 as well. So at the very least you >> need to explain why your change doesn't apply then as well. > > Yes some context is los

Re: [PATCH] libitm testsuite fixes

Ping. Cesar On 5/30/13 1:02 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > Here is a patch from our backlog that addresses a libitm issue where > setting ENABLE_LTO=1 in site.exp causes the following error with dejagnu: > > ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "libitm_target_compile lin

Re: [PATCH] libgomp testsuite fixes

Ping. Cesar On 5/30/13 12:59 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > Here is a patch from our backlog at Mentor Graphics that addresses a > libgomp issue where setting ENABLE_LTO=1 in site.exp causes the following > error with dejagnu: > > ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "li

Re: [PATCH] ARMv6-M MI thunk fix

On 6/10/13 8:32 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 07/06/13 17:50, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >> On 6/6/13 9:00 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> The pipeline offset is 4 for Thumb2 as well. So at the very least you >>> need to explain why your change doesn't apply then

Re: [PATCH] ARMv6-M MI thunk fix

argets. Is the new comment OK? If so, please check it in since I do not have SVN write access. Thanks, Cesar 2013-06-07 Julian Brown Cesar Philippidis gcc/ * config/arm/arm.c (arm_output_mi_thunk): Fix offset for TARGET_THUMB1_ONLY. Index: gcc/confi

[PATCH] ARMv6-M MI thunk fix

multiple inheritance, and that triggered the problem. I tested this patch with the default ARM and THUMB multilibs in additional to -march=armv6-m. OK for trunk? Cesar 2013-06-06 Julian Brown Cesar Philippidis gcc/ * config/arm/arm.c (arm_output_mi_thunk): Fix

[PATCH] libffi documentation fix

This patch from libffi revision 675c9839224 allows libffi.pdf to be generated without tex related errors. I tested it on gcc trunk. Please backport it to gcc. The original patch can be found here: http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2013/msg00086.html Cesar 2013-06-03 Andreas Schwab

[PATCH] libitm testsuite fixes

lugin}}" does not exist. This problem usually does not occur since the default site.exp does not contain ENABLE_LTO=1. This patch has been tested both with and without our custom site.exp. Is this OK for trunk? If so, please check it in since I do not have commit rights. Cesar Philippidis 2013-0

[PATCH] libgomp testsuite fixes

-fuse-linker-plugin}}" does not exist. This problem usually does not occur since the default site.exp does not contain ENABLE_LTO=1. I tested both with and without our custom site.exp. Is it OK for trunk? If so, please check it in since I do not have commit rights. Cesar Philippidis 2013-0

<    2   3   4   5   6   7