Hi Tobias,
Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
implementing the function
bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
or something similarly named.
If you will work on it, please tell me -
Sounds interesting. I'll give it a shot.
Thomas
Le 28/03/2013 18:48, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
> Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
> implementing the function
>bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
> or something similarly named.
>
> It should return true, if the expression is known to be noncontiguous
Thomas Koenig wrote:
below is a patch which improves dependency checking for array
assignments and calculation of string lengths.
Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested
implementing the function
bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *);
or something similar
I wrote:
Ping**2?
I'd like to get these patches committed, if possible, to clear up my
trees a little bit :-)
Thomas
*ping*
Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested
by Dominique.
OK for trunk?
2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45159
*ping*
Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested
by Dominique.
OK for trunk?
2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45159
* gfortran.h (gfc_dep_difference): Add prototype.
* dependency.c (discard_nops): New function.
(gfc_dep_differenc