While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103
patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch
corrects the error.
I have tested this fix on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
regressions. Is this ok for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-06-3
On 6/30/17 10:56 AM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103
> patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch
> corrects the error.
>
> I have tested this fix on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
> regressions. Is th
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:56:03AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
>
> While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103
> patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch
> corrects the error.
A syntax error, even... I wonder why we haven't noticed that bef