> On 12/20/23 4:17 AM, Jin Ma wrote:
> > We don't have SI -> BF library functions, use SI -> SF -> BF
> > instead. Although this can also be implemented in a target
> > machine description, it is more appropriate to move
> > into target independent code.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > *
On 12/20/23 4:17 AM, Jin Ma wrote:
We don't have SI -> BF library functions, use SI -> SF -> BF
instead. Although this can also be implemented in a target
machine description, it is more appropriate to move
into target independent code.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* optabs.cc (expand_float):
I apologize for not attaching a reference link.
Ref:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/2023091908.2089-1-ji...@linux.alibaba.com/
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641119.html
BR
Jin
ping
We don't have SI -> BF library functions, use SI -> SF -> BF
instead. Although this can also be implemented in a target
machine description, it is more appropriate to move
into target independent code.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* optabs.cc (expand_float): Split SI -> BF into SI -> SF -> BF.
---
