On 4/13/20 9:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/13/20 1:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 12:39 -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
GCC 10 has changed the formatting of zero-length arrays in diagnostics
to include their bound, but it also inadvertently added the zero bound
to fle
On 4/13/20 1:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 12:39 -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
GCC 10 has changed the formatting of zero-length arrays in diagnostics
to include their bound, but it also inadvertently added the zero bound
to flexible array members which are confusingly
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 12:39 -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> GCC 10 has changed the formatting of zero-length arrays in diagnostics
> to include their bound, but it also inadvertently added the zero bound
> to flexible array members which are confusingly represented differently
> betwee
GCC 10 has changed the formatting of zero-length arrays in diagnostics
to include their bound, but it also inadvertently added the zero bound
to flexible array members which are confusingly represented differently
between the C and C++ front ends.
The attached patch corrects the problem so both z
