On Apr 23, 2024, "Kewen.Lin" wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>> -/* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-do run { xfail powerpc*-*-* } } */
>> +/* The ppc xfail is because of PR target/58684. */
> OK, though the
Hi,
on 2024/4/22 18:00, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2021, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> operand exception for quiet NaN. I couldn't find any evidence that
>>> the rs6000 backend ever outputs fcmpo. Therefore, I'm adding the same
>>> execution
On Mar 10, 2021, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> operand exception for quiet NaN. I couldn't find any evidence that
>> the rs6000 backend ever outputs fcmpo. Therefore, I'm adding the same
>> execution xfail marker to this test.
> In my view, such an XFAIL
