On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 10:04 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 11/18/2015 11:20 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 11:20 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>Otherwise ok.
> >
> >See modified patch below. If you think vrp98.c is unnecessary, feel free
> >to dump it
On 11/20/2015 10:04 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/18/2015 11:20 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Otherwise ok.
See modified patch below. If you think vrp98.c
On 11/18/2015 11:20 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Otherwise ok.
See modified patch below. If you think vrp98.c is unnecessary, feel free
to dump it :).
If ok, could you commit it for me please? I don't have commit access.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On November 14, 2015 9:49:28 AM GMT+01:00,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:40AM
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On November 14, 2015 9:49:28 AM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> > >
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On November 14, 2015 9:49:28 AM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> > wrote:
> > >On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:13:41AM +0100, Marc Glisse
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:13:41AM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
> >This patch came out of a discussion held in the gcc mailing list
> >(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-11/msg00067.html).
> >
> >The patch restricts folding of conditional exprs
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
This patch came out of a discussion held in the gcc mailing list
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-11/msg00067.html).
The patch restricts folding of conditional exprs with lhs previously
set by a type conversion to occur only if the source of
On November 14, 2015 9:49:28 AM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:13:41AM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> >This patch came out of a discussion held in the gcc mailing list
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 14, 2015 9:49:28 AM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:13:41AM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
This patch came out of a discussion held in the gcc mailing list
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-11/msg00067.html).
The patch restricts folding of conditional exprs with lhs previously
set by a type conversion to occur only if the source of the type
conversion's mode is word mode or smaller.
13 matches
Mail list logo