On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr
> (i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library
> routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an
> INTEGER_CST is smaller or e
> Am 13.01.2024 um 10:44 schrieb Jakub Jelinek :
>
> Hi!
>
> As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr
> (i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library
> routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an
> INTEGER_CST is
Hi!
As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr
(i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library
routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an
INTEGER_CST is smaller or equal to limb_prec, the code correctly uses
m_limb_type;