On 20 January 2016 at 15:22, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> gcc/
>
> 2016-01-20 James Greenhalgh
> Ramana Radhakrishnan
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Refactor,
>
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:56:29AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:29:29AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:22:11PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In a number of cases where we try to create vectors we end up
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:29:29AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:22:11PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In a number of cases where we try to create vectors we end up spilling to
> > the
> > stack and then filling. This is one example distilled
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:22:11PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In a number of cases where we try to create vectors we end up spilling to the
> stack and then filling. This is one example distilled from a couple of
> micro-benchmrks where the issue shows up. The reason for the
Hi,
In a number of cases where we try to create vectors we end up spilling to the
stack and then filling. This is one example distilled from a couple of
micro-benchmrks where the issue shows up. The reason for the extra cost
in this case is the unnecessary use of the stack. The patch attempts to