Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 02:14 -0700, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In
> > principle
> > the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
> > opinion.
> >
> > The biggest
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 02:14 -0700, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In principle
> the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
> opinion.
>
> The biggest concern I have is that the analysis shou
Hi Steve,
Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In principle
the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
opinion.
The biggest concern I have is that the analysis should be possible at (or
prior to) the point where the prologue/epilogue ar
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 00:32 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> New command-line options need documenting in invoke.texi.
Good point, thanks for catching that. Here is an updated patch with
invoke.texi. There are no other changes to the patch.
Steve Ellcey
sell...@imgtec.com
2015-07-31 Steve Ellce
New command-line options need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
