Re: ping x 7: [PATCH] [libgomp] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork

2014-11-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Ping^2. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Ping. > > On 19 Oct 2014 23:44, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote: >> >> Hi Jakub, >> >> Thanks for your feedback! See below. >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Nathan

Re: ping x 7: [PATCH] [libgomp] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork

2014-10-19 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Hi Jakub, Thanks for your feedback! See below. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Got total silence the last 4 times I posted this, and users have been >> bugging me about it offline, so trying again. >> >>

Re: ping x 7: [PATCH] [libgomp] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork

2014-10-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Got total silence the last 4 times I posted this, and users have been > bugging me about it offline, so trying again. > > This patch fixes a showstopper problem preventing the transparent use > of OpenMP in scientific libraries, es

ping x 7: [PATCH] [libgomp] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork

2014-10-13 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Hi all, Got total silence the last 4 times I posted this, and users have been bugging me about it offline, so trying again. This patch fixes a showstopper problem preventing the transparent use of OpenMP in scientific libraries, esp. with Python. Specifically, it is currently not possible to use