Re: wide-int, cfg

2014-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >>> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port >>> and front end maintainers can review their parts w

Re: wide-int, cfg

2014-04-24 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port >> and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through >> the entire patch.This patc

Re: wide-int, cfg

2013-11-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port > and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through > the entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code. > > Ok? Hmm, this is an example o

wide-int, cfg

2013-11-23 Thread Mike Stump
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code. Ok? * cfgloop.c (alloc_loop): Initialize nb_iterations_upper_bound and